Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ain't Nothin' to Get Excited About

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) –Davey2010^Talk 20:48, 16 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Ain't Nothin' to Get Excited About

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not appear to be notable enough to warrant its own Wikipedia article. Lachlan Foley (talk) 09:38, 9 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:04, 9 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:04, 9 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep or Merge to Procol Harum. Should at least get a mention in the Procol Harum article. I found these: [1], [2], [3]. If more can be found it might be keepable as a standalone article. --Michig (talk) 07:22, 10 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. There was also a Village Voice piece about the album. And I also feel that the info sits better here, rather than trying to wedge it into the band article. --Hobbes Goodyear (talk) 01:52, 16 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.