Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Agent Extensibility Protocol

Agent Extensibility Protocol

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

• How to contribute
• Introduction to deletion process
• Guide to deletion (glossary)
• Help, my article got nominated for deletion!

Agent Extensibility Protocol (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Refs added are only passing mentions, lack WP:SIGCOV. Still fails WP:GNG. - UtherSRG (talk) 10:56, 13 June 2025 (UTC)

• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. UtherSRG (talk) 10:56, 13 June 2025 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Previous WP:PROD candidate, ineligible for soft deletion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 14:29, 20 June 2025 (UTC)

• Keep - I've added another source for good measure. More to be found searching RFC 2741. ~Kvng (talk) 14:26, 21 June 2025 (UTC)

  Hi, these don't look notable to me. A quick Google Scholar search reveals that the topic is obscure and only mentioned in articles with a tiny number of citations. Caleb Stanford (talk) 17:04, 27 June 2025 (UTC)

• Keep By doing research RFC 2741 the article is notable--Unclethepoter (talk) 21:49, 24 June 2025 (UTC)

  An RFC doesn't meet WP:RS and is likely primary. Caleb Stanford (talk) 17:03, 27 June 2025 (UTC)

Keep. On a pure sourcing basis, IETF and CRC Press are definitely reliable. guninvalid (talk) 18:34, 26 June 2025 (UTC)

IETF is primary. The CRC book is not well cited so I am not sure it should be used to support notability. Caleb Stanford (talk) 17:16, 27 June 2025 (UTC)

• Delete Fails WP:PROMO and WP:AUDIENCE. Regarding notability, the sources that were provided are obscure (not well cited) scientific works; "multiple independent, significant, and independent of the subject" does not appear to be met. Merge to Simple Network Management Protocol is a reasonable alternative to deletion. Caleb Stanford (talk) 17:01, 27 June 2025 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Keep or delete?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris ^talk! 09:37, 28 June 2025 (UTC)