Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Adelphi Hotel

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep. Non-admin closure. Ravenswing 09:49, 6 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Adelphi Hotel

Fails to establish context (A1), provide content (A3), or to establish notability (A7) Coldmachine^Talk 20:22, 29 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to Britannia Hotels. _The_ Adelphi Hotel is the one in Liverpool, for which "Britannia Hotels" is the correct article. The Melbourne hotel may be genuine, but there are no sources to establish its notability. The Leeds hotel, as described, sounds very much like a hoax to me - "the highest score on ice"? Tevildo (talk) 20:33, 29 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - Establishes context on first line (hotel in Sheffield). Notability is also established as it is the birthplace of both the city's professional football clubs and Yorkshire CCC. It was a major hotel in Sheffield and often central to events on the local sporting scene. josh (talk) 21:39, 29 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Weak keep as it asserts significant notability. Can good proof be found? Bearian'sBooties (talk) 23:28, 29 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
keep. Notability is asserted, established, contextualized. Grammar could do with clean-up. --Paularblaster (talk) 02:36, 30 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral. Not really sure where we should go on this one. We now have adequate sources for the existence of the Sheffield hotel (sincerest apologies for my earlier mistake), but does the mere fact that it was the venue for an important meeting make it notable in its own right? We also have the Liverpool hotel (which, I think, most people will be looking for under "Adelphi Hotel", if only because of the TV series) and the Melbourne hotel (which, apparently, won an architectural award) to take into account; there are no published notability criteria for buildings, which doesn't help. At the very least, we're going to need some sort of disambiguation arrangement if the article is kept. Tevildo (talk) 02:56, 30 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Keep The article is acceptable. Masterpiece2000 (talk) 10:29, 30 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Article shows clear notability. I have added a disambiguation headnote for the Liverpool Adelphi. If other Adelphis are to have articles then this article can be moved to Adelphi Hotel (Sheffield) and a disambiguation page can be created. Phil Bridger (talk) 12:46, 30 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Adelphi Hotel (Sheffield) as Liverpool Adelphi more notable than this, agreeing with User:Tevildo. MikeHobday (talk) 15:33, 31 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Rename to Adelphi Hotel (Sheffield). Change Adelphi Hotel into a redirect to Adelphi#Other uses. It appears clear from the discussion that there is no primary use for the name so it should redirect to the dab page. Vegaswikian (talk) 00:05, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.