Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Adaptive Concentration

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Davewild (talk) 18:26, 7 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Adaptive Concentration

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

WP:TOOSOON. Article is a summary of a single arXiv preprint that, according to GScholar, has been cited exactly once, in another arXiv preprint. QVVERTYVS (hm?) 08:40, 15 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:31, 16 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 01:36, 22 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete pretty much per nom - essay/summary of original work that has not been found notable at least yet.

This being said, my web search led me to think "adaptative random forests" is a real subject, with papers being published and dating back to 2006 (alas, all papers were paywalled, so it might be a completely different thing). My !vote comes without prejudice against the (re)creation of an article about that. Tigraan (talk) 16:08, 23 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, JAaron95 (Talk) 13:58, 30 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.