Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Adamantine
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was keep. howcheng [ t • c • w • e ] 19:33, 16 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Vanity page of a local band. Orphan and, until recently, uncategorized. Mecanismo | Talk 22:18, 11 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- It was previously a redirect to adamant; it should have stayed that way. Postdlf 22:21, 11 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- BJAODN, it is very
pfunny, and then revert it to a redirect. -- stillnotelf has a talk page 22:25, 11 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- I was referring to this version, the original nominated version. I have no problems with the new version. -- stillnotelf has a talk page 01:23, 13 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- keep its still stubby but have a look at it now ive tried to fix it. BL kiss the lizard 06:56, 12 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep in current form, although improvements along thi vein will be happily accepted. Saberwyn - 08:38, 12 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Please check the content at adamant—it already covers uses of the "adamantine" form of the word. There's no sense in having two separate articles. This should simply be merged and redirected there. Postdlf 18:35, 12 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- it mentions the fictional uses of the word but not the real mineral adamantine which deserves its own article if someone can expand it more than i just did. BL kiss the lizard 00:58, 13 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep after rewrite. howcheng [ t • c • w • e ] 21:38, 13 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep, deserves its own article.Mhaesen 10:38, 14 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.