Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Acheson process
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. -- Ed (Edgar181) 20:33, 12 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Acheson process (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
It looks like a repeat of Graphite Invention of synthetic graphite Zhounsbhs (talk) 10:25, 2 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. —Tom Morris (talk) 15:03, 2 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:10, 2 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. Stub has the potential to be expanded to give fuller details of the process. Xxanthippe (talk) 21:32, 2 January 2012 (UTC).[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Armbrust, B.Ed. Let's talkabout my edits? 12:16, 9 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep per Xxanthippe, a google book search for "Acheson process" returns 3,500 results. There is enough scope for this stub to be expanded well beyond the content of Graphite, we don't delete articles for problems which can be fixed by editing. Quasihuman | Talk 12:45, 9 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment I have expanded the article a little, and added another ref. Quasihuman | Talk 13:36, 9 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep per the above. Meets WP:GNG and merge to Graphite isn't really warranted due to the expansion of the article. Location (talk) 05:11, 12 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.