Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Abyss (Capcom)
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo (talk) 12:21, 22 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Abyss (Capcom) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
Does not meet the standards set forth in Wikipedia policy of WP:FICT for secondary reliable sources due to lack of secondary reliable sources. Also only is plot information. Wikipedia is not a plot summary Bbwlover 05:20, 16 November 2007 (UTC) Bbwlover 05:20, 16 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: Per FICT and NOT. If it really is important to the game, merge to that article. - Rjd0060 05:33, 16 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete this is long overdue. Abyss is not notable other than maybe for being the easiest fighting game end boss of all time. JuJube 06:33, 16 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge and redirect back to Marvel vs. Capcom 2: New Age of Heroes, the only place where it is relevant, no out-of-universe details to satisfy WP:FICT. The merged text should be cut right down and can then be cited/reworded as necessary. Someone another 07:12, 16 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, or Merge to Marvel vs. Capcom 2: New Age of Heroes - ¿Amar៛Talk to me/My edits 10:51, 16 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete I tagged it for notability as I saw that there were contributors working on it and thought they might be able to show some notability. That hasn't happened and I don't think it will. MLA 14:10, 16 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete No secondary sources to establish notability or provide real world context. -- Jay32183 (talk) 20:43, 16 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.