Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/AMX-003 Gaza-C

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. No policy or guideline reasons for keeping were provided, and the nomination is not in bad faith. --Core desat 19:53, 16 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

AMX-003 Gaza-C

During a mass de-prodding of articles by TheFarix on Gundam related articles, I reviewed the various removals of the subst'd {{prod}} and have listed this one, the AMX-003 Gaza-C for deletion, as it does not assert its own importance in the Gundam metaseries.—Ryūlóng (竜龍) 01:27, 10 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy delete Oh come on. This is an encyclopedia, not an... I don't know what... this doesn't belong here whatever the case. Jobjörn (Talk ° contribs) 01:48, 10 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Merge per WP:FICT. There's enough content here to be included into a "List of" article along with other mecha from the same series and faction. Cleanup and mergers are always preferable to deletion, which should be reserve for extreme cases. --Farix (Talk) 02:26, 10 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Anime and manga-related deletions. -- SkierRMH 03:24, 10 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete due to lack of independent sources in which this was the primary subject. Non-notable. Edison 06:02, 10 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per my nom in Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/AMX-104 R-Jarja. MER-C 06:52, 10 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Strong Delete Get this crap OUTA here MiracleMat 07:25, 10 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - and don't let this turn into listcruft. - fails WP:V, WP:RS, WP:OR, WP:FICT. Moreschi ^Deletion! 08:56, 10 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Fails notability, lack of references.--Folantin 09:45, 10 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete or merge. No notability asserted, just a bunch of stats. JIP | Talk 10:36, 10 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Merge with Mecha in Mobile Suit Gundam ZZ. Doesn't deserve its own article, but the information isn't useless as well. Shrumster 14:20, 10 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Very weak merge into a new list of Gundam mecha (per WP:FICT for minor characters) as the first of the Neo Zeon mecha. --Pak21 17:10, 10 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. Xiner (talk, email) 19:12, 10 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Keep While I suspect that I would vote for merge or delete were this article proposed singly, the sheer volume of recent nominations for deletion in this category makes the already short time to assess and/or improve said articles completely inadequate. Edward321 00:32, 11 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Keep pending a more reasonably organized deletion discussion. AfDs in this manner are in bad taste and wastes time on both sides. -- Ned Scott 06:45, 11 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. Alex43223^{Talk | Contribs | E-mail | C}
Keep Bad faith nomination. Jtrainor 11:21, 12 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

..? Why is this a bad faith nomination? --TheEmulatorGuy 05:35, 15 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as per nom. Not a bad faith nomination. Afd process is fine here. Articles are being considered on a case by case basis Bwithh 12:45, 12 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. WP:IDONTLIKEIT seems to be the reasoning behind this nomination and behind most of the support for deleting it. IDONTLIKEIT isn't a valid reason for deletion. Redxiv 20:53, 13 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

But WP:NOT, WP:NOR, and WP:FICT are. --TheEmulatorGuy 05:35, 15 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Keep If contents are arranged definitely, there is not a problem.--shikai shaw 07:16, 14 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.