Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ACME Secret Agent

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 04:27, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ACME Secret Agent

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Font with no claim in article of being notable. Good faith Gsearch isn't turning up sources showing notability. Was deleted through prod and recreated, so here we are. Fabrictramp | talk to me 03:27, 30 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Nothing found on Gsearch and no claims of notability. --Domdeparis (talk) 09:57, 30 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 15:33, 30 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete for calling a typeface a font. Grrrrr… But seriously, no, the subject is not notable. No sources, and none to be found. 100% OR. Mduvekot (talk) 22:52, 30 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete for the above reasons. Blythwood (talk) 15:46, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.