Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/88open

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Merger discussions can be followed up on talk Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 22:44, 20 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

88open

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not meet WP:GNG Liam McM 01:37, 30 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:25, 30 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:25, 30 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:25, 30 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:25, 30 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 11:37, 6 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: Per The Alliance Revolution, Systems Integration, Computerworld, The Law of Unfair Competition Trademarks and Monopolies, Volume 3, and CommUNIXations. SL93 (talk) 00:25, 7 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 06:12, 13 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. At the very least, 'The Alliance Revolution: The New Shape of Business Rivalry' seems to show this topic received several pages of prose discussion in a book, so it seems to meet GNG. --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 06:36, 13 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Merge into Motorola 88000 since the sole purpose of the organization seems to be to promote that technology. Not independently notable but should be mentioned for historical significance despite failure in the long term. W Nowicki (talk) 17:45, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep this meets WP:GNG as shown above. the sole purpose of the organization seems to be to promote that technology is no reason to delete an article. f e minist 15:35, 20 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.