Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/4Main
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Cirt (talk) 01:39, 6 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- 4Main (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Appears to fail WP:WEB. SchuminWeb (Talk) 04:11, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. -- Ray (talk) 04:32, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete at present there is no "non-trivial published work whose source is independent of the site itself", much less multiple ones. The only citations are to (1) the site itself, (2) the trivial company information at alexa.com and (3) one blog entry which could be by the founders of the site. --Bejnar (talk) 05:56, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment The blog entry I used as a reference wrote by someone who wrote other reviews about other social networks too and the entry date is October 2008 and it's obvious if it was from one of site founders, they would update the old screen shots. 4Main does not looks like those screen shots any more. --Vafarin (talk) 07:02, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Yeah, but you see, blogs are still generally not reliable sources. SchuminWeb (Talk) 16:59, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Hands up, this site is less than 1 year old and really I couldn't find any other references, but there are some other sites in social network list of wiki without these reliable sources. how do they get listed!? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 207.182.154.202 (talk • contribs)
- Wikipedia has certain notability criteria that determines what is worthy of inclusion and what isn't. In this case, WP:WEB applies. If they don't meet the criteria, they have no article on Wikipedia. SchuminWeb (Talk) 05:05, 5 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete I searched through google and only found blogs and forums discussing 4Main. Could not find any reliable sources to establish notability. A new name 2008 (talk) 13:30, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.