Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2paragraphs

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Relisted twice, with no one advocating keeping the article. Deor (talk) 11:00, 3 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

2paragraphs (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not notable. Lacks coverage in independent reliable sources. Current sourcing is a public policy research organization (not a RS, author writes for 2paragraphs, not independent), a blog and their own site. A search found nothing better. duffbeerforme (talk) 07:17, 11 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:25, 12 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of News media-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:25, 12 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:25, 12 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Davewild (talk) 17:26, 18 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, j⚛e deckertalk 05:54, 26 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

  • Weak delete - Research indicates that, while 2paragraphs does generate content, there is not much written about 2paragraphs. Hence, I don't think that 2paragraphs itself is notable.--Rpclod (talk) 01:19, 27 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.