Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2015–2018 curling statistics (2nd nomination)
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. RL0919 (talk) 01:39, 20 February 2020 (UTC)
AfDs for this article:
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- 2015–2018 curling statistics (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Unencyclopedic collection of fairly miscellaneous curling results with no context. The article has no references and no other articles link to it. A202985 (talk) 01:17, 13 February 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions. A202985 (talk) 01:26, 13 February 2020 (UTC)
- Delete: Wikipedia is not for excessive listings of unexplained statistics per WP:NOTSTATSBOOK. Bait30 Talk? 02:15, 13 February 2020 (UTC)
- Delete. Unsourced statscruft. Ajf773 (talk) 02:34, 13 February 2020 (UTC)
- Delete. Let's get rid of this eyesore once and for all! -- Earl Andrew - talk
- Delete. I don’t know who made this but it’s horrible. Thank goodness it will be deleted -- TracyFleuryFan - talk
- Delete per WP:NOTSTATSBOOK. Hog Farm (talk) 03:26, 13 February 2020 (UTC)
- Delete per WP:NOTSTATSBOOK. Minecrafter0271 (talk) 18:09, 13 February 2020 (UTC)
- Sweep it away, hard! A weird agglomeration of stats that needs to be taken out of the Wikipedial house (I've watched too much curling). Clarityfiend (talk) 06:22, 14 February 2020 (UTC)
- Delete My question is why is this even a page of Wikipedia. HawkAussie (talk) 00:32, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.