Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/1785 Wurm

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to List of minor planets: 1001–2000. (non-admin closure) Mz7 (talk) 00:29, 18 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

1785 Wurm

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Doesn't meet WP:NASTRO or WP:GNG, but as a low-numbered asteroid, needs a thorough discussion rather than a unilateral redirect. My personal opinion is that is should be deleted or (preferably) redirected to List of minor planets: 1001–2000 in line with WP:NASTRO. Boleyn (talk) 18:57, 11 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete or Redirect. per nom. Does not meet WP:NASTRO in and of itself. Ormr2014 | Talk

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 23:24, 11 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect. Part of an 11-object group lightcurve study [1] but that's all I found, and I don't think it's enough. —David Eppstein (talk) 00:24, 12 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect per WP:DWMP: unable to satisfy notability requirements based on existing sources. Praemonitus (talk) 20:34, 13 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect per WP:NASTRO (WP:NASTCRIT) No significant coverage found on this object itself. Everything on google scholar is a paper listing several asteroids (explicitly mentioned in NASTCRIT #3 as not meeting notability) ― Padenton|✉ 21:48, 17 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.