Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/1292 Luce

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to List of minor planets: 1001-2000. (non-admin closure) Esquivalience ^t 00:51, 25 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

1292 Luce

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Doesn't meet WP:NASTRO or WP:GNG. Should be deleted or redirected per NASTRO to List of minor planets: 1001-2000. Boleyn (talk) 21:09, 17 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:48, 17 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect per WP:DWMP: Single photometry study found, which had little more than data.[1] Non-notable. Praemonitus (talk) 15:56, 18 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect. Besides the study mentioned above, it's a line in a table of a paper about clustering asteroids into families [2] but I don't think that helps much in establishing any kind of notability for this object. —David Eppstein (talk) 18:17, 18 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect. Can we do mass nominations for these, when possible? Neutrality^talk 04:30, 19 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Neutrality, there was a lot of opposition when an attempt was made at bundling and an agreement that they would be looked at individually. It's tedious and takes a while, but it will help bring the right result for each article. Boleyn (talk) 06:39, 19 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.