Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/10–0

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:17, 1 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

10–0

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article was just previously deleted as an expired PROD under the rational that it seemed to be a neologism along with WP:OR. It fails WP:GNG and WP:N. The only source in the article a a Google search, which is not a good one. Before I prodded it last week, I searched and could not find any significant coverage of this. ArcAngel (talk) ) 06:55, 22 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Comment I just caught it. Coverage in Turkish seem significant: [1], [2] ^walk victor falk^talk 07:01, 22 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. ChrisTheDude (talk) 08:54, 22 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Turkey-related deletion discussions. ^walk victor falk^talk 11:02, 22 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Article obviously needs significant improvements, but the match seems to have received a considerable amount of coverage, and would seem no less notable than the other league record victories that have survived AfDs. J Mo 101 (talk) 11:13, 22 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Weak keep on assumption it is/was a league record. The name of the article requires disambiguation though because I thought it would refer to the more recent PSV v Feyenoord match. Jmorrison230582 (talk) 13:09, 22 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- ........whereas I thought it referred to Gillingham vs Chesterfield in 1987 (a game I was at!). If the article is kept, a more descriptive title must be found -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 13:36, 22 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Weak keep - I was under the impression that record setting matches are usually considered notable. This article clearly needs improvement and renaming, but I think it can kept. Sir Sputnik (talk) 13:55, 22 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Keep as above, seems like a notable match, but needs a better name and tidy-up. Giant Snowman 16:51, 22 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Keep as a record-breaking game with plenty of coverage. However adopt a more standard naming format and move to something like Beşiktaş J.K. 10–0 Adana Demirspor in the style of articles like Nottingham Forest F.C. 1–8 Manchester United F.C., Arbroath 36–0 Bon Accord etc. Keresaspa (talk) 19:14, 22 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Keep but rename it as it was a notable event/result. Kante4 (talk) 00:41, 25 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.