Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/1-2-Fly

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy deleted by RHaworth, CSD A7: Article about a company, corporation or organization, which does not credibly indicate the importance or significance of the subject. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 16:26, 15 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

1-2-Fly

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I can't verify that this airline exists...I get some hits, but they are in German (which I do not read) & appear to be a travel agency rather than an airline. TheLongTone (talk) 15:08, 7 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Comment I have a very basic understanding of German, so I'll see what I can do. If you want a user who hasn't been learning German for only 2 years and is a native speaker of German, notify Sandstein. ThePlatypusofDoom (Talk) 15:35, 7 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Only one or 2 possible RS's, but I'm not sure how reliable this source is (http://www.presseportal.de/pm/31717/3281981). So, deletion is the best option. ThePlatypusofDoom (Talk) 15:45, 7 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Very short article, prone to spam. KGirlTrucker87 (talk) 18:56, 7 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. clpo13_(talk) 17:03, 8 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Definitely delete unless the article can be expanded. Currently has almost no content. Also ,instead of the (more to come) thing, consider using {{under construction}}.
comment FWIW, article creat0or's only other edit was to create a bogus article purporting to be about a less than trivial aviation incident.TheLongTone (talk) 12:14, 9 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
SNOW Delete as I would've also pursued speedy deletion at best, there's nothing including minimally better for keeping and improving. SwisterTwister talk 05:30, 14 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.