Wikipedia:Administrator review/Animum

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Animum (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA)

I've had the tools for a little under two years now, and I would like to see how people think I'm doing. —Animum (talk) 20:47, 17 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Comments

I have no specific complaints about your performance. The adjective "useful" comes to mind when I think of you; your technical skills are always making editing that little bit easier. :-) Perhaps if I embarked upon a more comprehensive review of your logs, I might find some point or another to complain about, but I doubt it; again, there is nothing negative to say here. AGK 00:21, 18 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hehe, I'm sure you'd find plenty to complain about in the logs just after I was granted the tools, but I think I have matured as an administrator since then. Thanks for your review, AGK; I appreciate it a lot. :-) —Animum (talk) 01:41, 18 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Although not actually related to your administrator duties, I'm interested in whether you plan to complete User:Animum/Ageism. Ageism essays are always an interesting read. :-) AGK 19:10, 18 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Useful - Per AGK. Just off-the-cuff, I love the script work. You're always willing to listen to other's ideas and implement them. –xeno ^talk 01:43, 18 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Agree fully with AGK and Xeno. –Juliancolton | ^Talk 14:55, 19 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
You are a great administrator, Animum. Also, your scripts are impressively useful. Thank you very much for all your hard work. :) — Aitias // discussion 16:39, 21 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I think I've always looked upon you as a paragon of good clue and sensibility. You're one of a rare breed, Animum. —Anonymous Dissident^Talk 12:49, 28 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
You actually fix things when they're broken. Shocking. - Dank (push to talk) 18:22, 30 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Heh, well, I try. ;-) —Animum (talk) 20:57, 6 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Except when you accidentally rollbacked Jimbo...heeheehee. OK, I won't talk about it anymore. --Professor Fiendish^MWAHAHAHA!! 04:01, 21 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Shh!—there's no need to talk about that! >_> —Animum (talk) 00:59, 28 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Much too long a block log for an administrator. Deplorable. :P Newyorkbrad (talk) 19:30, 19 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
No Moar Abuse!!! J/k, great admin. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 22:53, 27 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Your block script rocks. Just putting that out there :-) J.delanoy ^gabs _adds 02:05, 29 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I knew Animum two years ago, back when he was known as Steptrip. I still remember when he went through RfA, and he was a great admin. I will have to agree with everyone else who comment here. NHRHS2010 | Talk to me 14:09, 1 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.