User talk:Yusuf Michael

First Baptist Academy Universal City moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to First Baptist Academy Universal City. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. JTtheOG (talk) 22:11, 23 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Alright, thank you! By more sources to establish notability, do you mean secondary sources? Yusuf Michael (talk) 01:40, 24 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, precisely. Secondary sources which cover the school directly and in-depth. JTtheOG (talk) 02:05, 24 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

September 2025

Hello, I'm CodeTalker. I noticed that you recently removed content from Takuzo Aida without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. CodeTalker (talk) 17:28, 25 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I took it out because it was written like a resume Yusuf Michael (talk) 17:52, 25 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion criteria

Please stop nominating articles for speedy deletion using invalid criteria. The valid criteria for speedy deletion are listed at WP:CSD. Using made-up criteria like "NPOV" as you did here and "Notability" as you did here is disruptive and just wastes other editors' time. Thank you. CodeTalker (talk) 17:39, 25 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

It's the only deletion template I can find Yusuf Michael (talk) 19:54, 25 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@CodeTalker Yusuf Michael (talk) 19:54, 25 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

If the article does not meet any of the criteria for speedy deletion, you can use Proposed Deletion (WP:PROD) or Articles for Deletion (WP:AFD). AFD is used in most cases; PROD should be used only when you are pretty sure that no one will contest the deletion.

However a user like yourself with only 256 edits probably does not have the necessary knowledge to understand when an article is a good candidate for deletion, so I would recommend that at this point you should not worry about deleting articles, and focus your efforts on making other improvements to the encyclopedia. CodeTalker (talk) 20:10, 25 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Ohhh my bad, I'm sorry @CodeTalker Yusuf Michael (talk) 21:29, 25 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I won't nominate anything for deletion again, I'm sorry, I thought I was going something good Yusuf Michael (talk) 21:30, 25 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Why are you still doing this? If you have an issue with NPOV add the appropriate template AND create a talkpage discussion as to how you believe the article should be improved. CNC (talk) 15:00, 23 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

October 2025

Hello, I'm Seasider53. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, The New York Times, but you didn't provide a reliable source. On Wikipedia, it's important that article content be verifiable. If you'd like to resubmit your change with a citation, your edit is archived in the page history. If you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Seasider53 (talk) 22:45, 28 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]