Jump to content

User talk:XShadowReconx

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

August 2018

[edit]

Information icon Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Cajon High School. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continual disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Encyclopedia articles are not dated. Please do not add date dependent copy that someone is going to have to update annually. There is a template you can add that automatically updates the info, or in the alternative, you can simply omit it. Most readers are smart enough to do simple math and figure it out themselves. John from Idegon (talk) 10:39, 24 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

It’s my job...

[edit]

I want to know how exactly I’m being disruptive, I’m simply expanding upon this article, forgive me I’m quite new at editing on this site but in my years of gathering information from it I believed that articles can be expanded upon by anyone. It has been an assignment given to me by my ASB director personally to expand upon this article. So it isn’t fair to me that my changes are being reverted. You’re making this look like juvenile and unnecessary banter, and I would appreciate it if you would just let me do my work. Thanks. XShadowReconx (talk) 14:49, 24 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This page is not the school's property. I don't give a rats ass what your boss told you to do. It cannot possibly be "your job" to modify something on the order of the school that is not theirs to modify. This is an independent encyclopedia article about the school, not a part of the school's social media portfolio. Please see the following and pay close attention. Every edit you have made has been in violation of the Wikimedia Foundations legally binding terms of use. I'd strongly suggest you not edit the article any further, take some of the time you are getting paid by your employer for and actually learn what Wikipedia is and how to properly edit it, and then follow the instructions below. John from Idegon (talk) 15:38, 24 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon Hello, XShadowReconx. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about in the page Cajon High School, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a COI may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

  • avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, company, organization or competitors;
  • propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (see the {{request edit}} template);
  • disclose your COI when discussing affected articles (see WP:DISCLOSE);
  • avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see WP:SPAM);
  • do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID).

Also please note that editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. John from Idegon (talk) 15:38, 24 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon

Hello XShadowReconx. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, such as the edit you made to Cajon High School, and that you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially egregious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to Black hat SEO.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists, and if it does not, from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:XShadowReconx. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=XShadowReconx|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, please do not edit further until you answer this message. John from Idegon (talk) 15:38, 24 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

August 2018

[edit]

Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Cajon High School, you may be blocked from editing. John from Idegon (talk) 15:42, 24 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]