User talk:Wikpediauser0

Welcome!

Hello, Wikpediauser0, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages you might find helpful:

Introduction
The five pillars of Wikipedia
How to edit a page
How to write a great article
Simplified Manual of Style
Your first article
Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community
Feel free to make test edits in the sandbox
and check out the Task Center, for ideas about what to work on.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to ask me on my talk page or place {{Help me}} on this page and someone will drop by to help. Again, welcome! Beeblebrox (talk) 03:16, 7 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Blooket

Hello, Wikpediauser0,

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username VersaceSpace and I thank you for your contributions.

I wanted to let you know, however, that I have tagged an article that you started, Blooket, for deletion, because a consensus decision previously decided that it wasn't suitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. If you wish to restore a page deleted via a deletion discussion, please use the deletion review process instead, rather than reposting the content of the page.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top. If the page is already deleted by the time you come across this message and you wish to retrieve the deleted material, please contact the deleting administrator.

For any further query, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|VersaceSpace}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

—VersaceSpace 🌃 20:41, 1 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

How'd you the page for Blooket so fast? Wikpediauser0 (talk) 21:03, 1 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Just interested that why would you repeatedly create a page deleted by AfD and its associated talk page? Many thanks! VickKiang (talk) 21:24, 1 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Because I was looking for some definition of what Blooket was, and I saw the Wikipedia page, but when I clicked on it turned out to be deleted, so I decided to recreate the page as best as I could. Wikpediauser0 (talk) 21:31, 1 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

It was deleted because a group ("consensus") of editors decided that it should be. This means it should not be recreated unless the new version complies with WP:N. —VersaceSpace 🌃 21:34, 1 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Got it... Wikpediauser0 (talk) 23:07, 9 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thx Wikpediauser0 (talk) 23:07, 9 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Im now blocked though...... :| Wikpediauser0 (talk) 23:08, 9 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

November 2022

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Bbb23 (talk) 21:53, 1 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Wikpediauser0 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Because I am "Here to build an encyclopedia" and have contributed numerous times. I have not vandalized anything and would like to continue contributing with this user account. Wikpediauser0 (talk) 23:12, 9 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Almost all of your edits were reverted. As you see no problem with your edits, there are no grounds to consider lifting the block. Yamla (talk) 21:49, 13 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

TPA access revoked and requests to sock removed.--Bbb23 (talk) 23:42, 14 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]