User talk:Wikipediangoqa

Speedy deletion nomination of Singaporean 2nd Infantry ambush

Hello, Wikipediangoqa,

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username Miminity and I thank you for your contributions.

I wanted to let you know, however, that I have tagged an article that you started, Singaporean 2nd Infantry ambush, for deletion, because a consensus decision previously decided that it wasn't suitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. If you wish to restore a page deleted via a deletion discussion, please use the deletion review process instead, rather than reposting the content of the page.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top. If the page is already deleted by the time you come across this message and you wish to retrieve the deleted material, please contact the deleting administrator.

For any further query, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Miminity}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Warm Regards, Miminity (Talk?) (me contribs) 11:48, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Miminity: Hi, I just wanted to ask why the article is being considered for deletion. I’d like to understand the reason more clearly. If there’s anything I can fix or improve, I’m open to learning and making changes.

But if the community decision is final and the article has to be deleted, I understand and respect that. I’ll do my best to create better articles in the future. If possible, I’d also appreciate any feedback on what was lacking in the article so I can learn from it. Thanks! Wikipediangoqa (talk) 14:56, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked as a sockpuppet

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts as a sockpuppet of User:Sabupusi per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Sabupusi. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you believe that there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. PhilKnight (talk) 15:35, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Wikipediangoqa (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I am sincerely and deeply sorry for my actions that violated Wikipedia’s policies on sockpuppetry. I humbly beg for a second chance. At the time, I truly did not understand the seriousness and consequences of using multiple accounts inappropriately. Now I realize how wrong I was and how my actions could have harmed the integrity of this community. :Wikipedia means a great deal to me—not just as a source of knowledge, but as a place where I felt I could contribute meaningfully and be part of something bigger. Losing that

Decline reason:

No chance, not while you continue to demonstrate you haven't the slightest intention of following our policies. You are so abusive, you are now considered banned by the community. Yamla (talk) 20:45, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.