User talk:Wikipedian reader 1234567

Hello Wikipedian reader 1234567! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking

or typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! Masterhatch (talk) 17:08, 17 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Getting Started
Wikipedia Tutorial • The five pillars of Wikipedia How to: edit a page • upload an image
Getting Help
Frequently Asked Questions Where to ask questions or make comments Request administrator attention
Policies and Guidelines
Neutral point of view • Reliable sources Verifiability • Citing sources • No original research What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Manual of Style • Three-revert rule • Sock puppetry Copyrights • Fair use • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability

The Community
Build consensus • Resolving disputes Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • No legal threats Community Portal • Village pump Signpost • IRC channels • Mailing lists
Things to do
Be bold in editing • Help develop an article Pages needing attention • Peer review Join a WikiProject • Translating articles Cleaning up: General • Spam • Vandalism
Miscellaneous
Useful templates • Categories • Stubs User pages • Talk pages Tools • User scripts

April 2025

Please stop attacking other editors. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. Capitals00 (talk) 13:01, 19 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I thought we could talk in the talk page. Wikipedian reader 1234567 (talk) 13:09, 19 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

But it was not a tradition I dont understand why he undid my edits. Wikipedian reader 1234567 (talk) 13:11, 19 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

See WP:TALK#USE and WP:UNCIVIL. Thanks. - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 14:30, 19 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Introduction to contentious topics

You have recently edited a page related to India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have an expanded level of powers and discretion in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
follow editorial and behavioural best practices;
comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
refrain from gaming the system.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures, you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.

Introduction to contentious topics: new version, minimum edit count and account age

You have recently edited a page related to the region of South Asia (India, Pakistan, Afghanistan, Sri Lanka, Bangladesh and Nepal), broadly construed, including but not limited to history, politics, ethnicity, and social groups, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia's norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have an expanded level of powers and discretion in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
follow editorial and behavioural best practices;
comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
refrain from gaming the system.

Additionally, you must be logged in, have 500 edits, and have an account age of 30 days in order to make edits related to two subtopics: (1) Indian military history, or (2) social groups, explicitly including caste associations and political parties related to India, Pakistan, Sri Lanka, Bangladesh and Nepal.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures, you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.

Ekdalian (talk) 07:49, 2 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

As per the new rules mentioned above, you are not supposed to edit such contentious topics like Dalit until you achieve the criteria (have 500 edits, and have an account age of 30 days)! Please be careful. Ekdalian (talk) 15:54, 3 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please read WP:PGAME. If you continue to make edits designed merely to get you to Extended Confirmed status, please be aware that the right will be taken away. Gaming the system is not a substitute for good faith editing. RegentsPark (comment) 19:29, 6 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

September 2025

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. However, in one of your recent edits, you added links to an article which did not add content or meaning, or repeated the same link several times throughout the article. Please see Wikipedia's guideline on links to avoid overlinking. Thank you. Remsense 🌈 论 18:57, 6 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Annh07. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Economy of India have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Annh07 (talk) 08:42, 14 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

What do you what me to do add a source, why cant that be important to add 3 apostrophes to make that more important, India is more of a mixed economy then any Western economy is or not like a totally Communist lead economic system like the Soviets. Wikipedian reader 1234567 (talk) 10:31, 14 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You shouldn't arbitrarily highlight a term in articles (if it's not the article title or it's not synonymous with the article title) just for the sake of emphasizing it. Please see MOS:BOLD. Annh07 (talk) 10:46, 14 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]