User talk:Wikimonad
Appearance
| This is Wikimonad's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments. |
|
Your submission at Articles for creation: Nikola Tesla – Mind from the Future (December 28)
[edit]
This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
- If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Nikola Tesla – Mind from the Future and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
- If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.
- I don't understand what is wrong? There is a list of references, and it is one of the most important exhibitions about Nikola Tesla made 8 years ago? Can you show me what makes it looks like - This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than? I am new in editing Wikipedia and I wanted to make set of articles about notable work that are inspired by Nikola Tesla from various fields in last 20 years, as people thik that Elon Musk is Nikola Tesla, what is devastating for science and future of humanity. Wikimonad (talk) 14:59, 28 December 2025 (UTC)
- Hi there @Wikimonad. Simply put, Wikipedia articles must be written strictly neutrally and factually. Words like..
- visionary artist .. record-breaking cultural event .. represents the culmination .. world-renowned artists ..
- are all promotional and need to be removed. Only summarise in a neutral way what the secondary sources state.
qcne (talk) 15:06, 28 December 2025 (UTC)
- ok I will remove it, it was quoted from sources added Wikimonad (talk) 15:47, 28 December 2025 (UTC)
|
Hello, Wikimonad!
Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! qcne (talk) 14:44, 28 December 2025 (UTC)
|
Your submission at Articles for creation: Nikola Tesla – Mind from the Future (December 28)
[edit]
This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
- If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Nikola Tesla – Mind from the Future and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
- If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.
- Hello, I already fixed suggested anomalies and made resubmission. I am not sure what you refer on now? Did you consulted references and links in article, those were source and inspiration for me to make Wikipedia article, as there is no that much exhibitions about Nikola Tesla as that one? Txt is neutral, maybe I am not aware on what you found out as promotional text, if you can let me know from article, what exactly is problematic, it will be of great help? Wikimonad (talk) 09:24, 29 December 2025 (UTC)
- "represents the culmination" .. "world-renowned artists" .. still stand out to me as problematic words. qcne (talk) 11:35, 29 December 2025 (UTC)
- Sorry I omitted that, thank you, I hope now is fixed :) Wikimonad (talk) 15:02, 29 December 2025 (UTC)
- "represents the culmination" .. "world-renowned artists" .. still stand out to me as problematic words. qcne (talk) 11:35, 29 December 2025 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation: Nikola Tesla – Mind from the Future (January 11)
[edit]
Your draft shows signs of having been generated by a large language model, such as ChatGPT. Wikipedia guidelines prohibit the use of LLMs to write articles from scratch. In addition, LLM-generated articles usually have multiple quality issues, to include:
- Promotional tone, editorializing and other words to watch
- Vague, generic, and speculative statements extrapolated from similar subjects
- Essay-like writing
- Hallucinations (plausible-sounding, but false information) and non-existent references
- Close paraphrasing
This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit it after they have been resolved.
- If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Nikola Tesla – Mind from the Future and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
- If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.
