User talk:Wikimob66

Welcome!

Hello, Wikimob66, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as User:Wikimob66, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's content policies and may not be retained. In short, the topic of an article must be notable and have already been the subject of publication by reliable and independent sources.

Please review Your first article for an overview of the article creation process. The Article Wizard is available to help you create an article, where it will be reviewed and considered for publication. For information on how to request a new article that can be created by someone else, see Requested articles. If you are stuck, come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can help you through the processes.

New to Wikipedia? Please consider taking a look at our introductory tutorial or reviewing the contributing to Wikipedia page to learn the basics about editing. Below are a few other good pages about article creation.

Article development
Standard layout
Lead section
The perfect article
Task Center – need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Go here.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, ask me on my talk page. You can also type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! Paradoctor (talk) 15:35, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Wikimob66

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. A tag has been placed on User:Wikimob66 requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section U5 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to consist of writings, information, discussions, or activities not closely related to Wikipedia's goals. Please note that Wikipedia is not a free web hosting service. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Paradoctor (talk) 15:35, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia and copyright

Hello Wikimob66! Your additions to Tyrell Davis have been removed in whole or in part, as they appear to have added copyrighted content without evidence that the source material is in the public domain or has been released by its owner or legal agent under a suitably free and compatible copyright license. (To request such a release, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission.) While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, it's important to understand and adhere to guidelines about using information from sources to prevent copyright and plagiarism issues. Here are the key points:

Limited quotation: You may only copy or translate a small portion of a source. Any direct quotations must be enclosed in double quotation marks (") and properly cited using an inline citation. More information is available on the non-free content page. To learn how to cite a source, see Help:Referencing for beginners.
Paraphrasing: Beyond limited quotations, you are required to put all information in your own words. Following the source's wording too closely can lead to copyright issues and is not permitted; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. Even when paraphrasing, you must still cite your sources as appropriate.
Image use guidelines: In most scenarios, only freely licensed or public domain images may be used and these should be uploaded to our sister project, Wikimedia Commons. In some scenarios, non-freely copyrighted content can be used if they meet all ten of our non-free content criteria; Wikipedia:Plain and simple non-free content guide may help with determining a file's eligibility.
Copyrighted material donation: If you hold the copyright to the content you want to copy, or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license the text for publication here. Please see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
Copying and translation within Wikipedia: Wikipedia articles can be copied or translated, however they must have proper attribution in accordance with Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. For translation, see Help:Translation § License requirements.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices. Persistent failure to comply may result in being blocked from editing. If you have any questions or need further clarification, please ask them here on this page, or leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Diannaa (talk) 12:33, 12 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I republished a quote on the Tyrell Davis page and properly added the proper citation. Perhaps you can remove you speedy deletion request? I really don't understand what the point is of sending me all the information on how to avoid copyright problems and then asking to delete me without giving me the opportunity to correct the mistakes. How is anybody supposed to learn and get better if you delete them? WikiMob66 Wikimob66 (talk) 09:49, 15 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The passage I removed had no quotation marks and no citation. I can send you the removed content via email if you like, but you will have to activate your Wikipedia email first. Diannaa (talk) 14:38, 15 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It appears that you misunderstood what I said. I do not deny that the information that you removed was not properly posted . We learn from our mistakes. So, my question was, now that you removed the improper info and I have posted a new quote properly, will you remove your Speedy deletion nomination of User:Wikimob66 ? What is the point of removing users simply because they've made a mistake? WikiMob66 Wikimob66 (talk) 01:35, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Contested deletion

This page should not be speedily deleted because (your reason here) --WikiMob66 Wikimob66 (talk) 07:54, 15 November 2024 (UTC) I corrected the copywrite error by adding only one quote and citing it. And there nothing wrong with saying who you are on your user page. How is anyone supposed to learn and make contributions if you delete user pages?[reply]

July 2025

Hello, I'm C.Fred. I noticed that you recently removed content from Bisexuality in the United States without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. —C.Fred (talk) 02:57, 28 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You are absolutely Incorrect I did adequately explain why repeatedly! Here's the latest... 1st off, it is not up to me to prove that the organizations did not exist, it's up to you or whoever posts the Information to prove that they did by supplying verifiable sources. The 1st link you provided makes the same false statements that I removed & provides NO verifiable sources. And, that doc was written & produced by BiNet USA of which Guren was President.Corp Which is why net usa is not a good source for Guren. I don't know if it's valid source for the other info so why would I remove it from all of instances where it was used? The 2nd & 3rd are identical statements written by the same person but published with two different titles. The author provides NO source for her statement whatsoever. And your statement that "the About pages for Pridelines and Care Resource mention these two organizations as their respective starting points." is untrue. Ptidelines about page does not mention the "Gay Teen Task Force" because it did not exist. Again if somebody says it does and they are required to provide valid source information but they cannot because it does not exist. And In fact, Pridelines was it in fact originally called The Gay and Lesbian Youth Group of South Florida. It has repeatedly been mislabeled as The Gay and Lesbian Youth Group off Miami. And, It has also been repeatedly stated that the group met on Fridays from 7 to 9:00 PM which is completely false. The group met on Mondays From 7 to 9:00 PM and the very 1st meeting was held on October 11, 1982. It is also falsely repeatedly stated that the group1st incorporated in 1999. The fact is the group 1st incorporated in 1990 as The Gay and Lesbian Youth Group of South Florida, Inc. GLYGSFInc And, The original text that I removed regarding Guren being on the founding BOD of directors of the Health Crisis Network stated that happened in 1981. The item referenced that says 1982, which is what you have reposted, once again was written and published by BiNet USA which Guren was running (conflict of interest - not a valid source) Not to mention Health Crisis Network wasn't founded until 1983. Every mention of Guren being on the founding BOD of HCN all lead back to the same BINet USA source which Guren was involved in creating yet doesn't even have the correct date. Again, neither of the two statements has a verifiable source. WikiMob66 Wikimob66 (talk) 02:36, 28 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I rechecked the source, and Wendy Curry was president of BiNet USA at the time of its publication, so I don't see what Alexei Guren has to do with the source's reliability at all. —C.Fred (talk) 10:32, 28 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]