User talk:Wiki Reader 1x

Welcome!

Hello, Wiki Reader 1x, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your recent edits to the page Rudolf Steiner did not conform to Wikipedia's verifiability policy, and may have been removed. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations verified in reliable, reputable print or online sources or in other reliable media. Always provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles.

If you are stuck and looking for help, please see the guide for citing sources or come to The Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

The five pillars of Wikipedia
Introduction tutorial
Contributing to Wikipedia
How to edit a page
Help pages
Simplified Manual of Style
Task Center – need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Go here.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need personal help ask me on my talk page, or ask a question on your talk page. Again, welcome. tgeorgescu (talk) 18:37, 7 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

December 2021

Hello, I'm Tgeorgescu. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Rudolf Steiner have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse. Thanks. tgeorgescu (talk) 22:14, 7 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Unfortunately, content you added to Rudolf Steiner appears to be a minority or fringe viewpoint, and appears to have given undue weight to this minority viewpoint, and has been reverted. To maintain a neutral point of view, an idea that is not broadly supported by scholarship in its field must not be given undue weight in an article about a mainstream idea. Feel free to use the article's talk page to discuss this, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. tgeorgescu (talk) 22:16, 7 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

For more details see WP:IN-UNIVERSE. Hint: the mainstream view is represented by mainstream religious studies of Western esotericism. tgeorgescu (talk) 22:44, 7 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Rudolf Steiner, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use your sandbox for that. Thank you. Johnj1995 (talk) 15:42, 9 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at Rudolf Steiner, you may be blocked from editing. Johnj1995 (talk) 16:14, 9 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]