User talk:Weissbobocho5

Linking

Greetings.

If I may ask, is there a reason you believe that every term on Wikipedia (small words such as Intersection, July & Sun) should be linked to an article? GeographicAccountant (talk) 15:01, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Agustín Coppel Luken (October 8)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by SafariScribe were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Agustín Coppel Luken and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 02:52, 8 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Weissbobocho5! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 02:52, 8 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Agustín Coppel Luken (December 28)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by WikiAviator were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
reliable
secondary
independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Agustín Coppel Luken and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

WikiAviator^talk 07:53, 28 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

MOS:OVERLINK

Please, read what the MOS indicates and don't link terms that will most likely be understood by most readers. Xexerss (talk) 16:28, 14 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Xexerss,

I appreciate your feedback and understand the importance of adhering to the Manual of Style. My intention in adding links is to provide the greatest possible clarity to articles, ensuring that people with different levels of knowledge can fully understand the information presented.

Wikipedia is a vast source of knowledge accessible to a diverse audience, ranging from children to older adults, and not everyone is equally familiar with certain terms (even if they are names of countries). Additionally, internal links not only enhance comprehension but also enrich the reading experience by encouraging readers to explore and navigate through the wealth of articles available on Wikipedia.

That being said, I value your insight and will keep the established guidelines in mind to improve my future edits. Thank you for your time and contribution!

Best regards Weissbobocho5 (talk) 16:59, 14 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding links in violation of MOS:OVERLINK like [1]. Robby.is.on (talk) 19:40, 14 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 8

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Argenta station, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mediterranean Style House. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 07:58, 8 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 1

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited European Academy of Occupational Health Psychology, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Pan-European.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 08:01, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Agustín Coppel Luken

Hello, Weissbobocho5. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Agustín Coppel Luken, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 08:09, 30 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]