User talk:Weatheriscool777

Wild edits

@Weatheriscool777 Please don't make such edits on 2023 Atlantic Hurricane Season . Wikipedia is not for jokes. Hurricanehiker 2208 (talk) 01:52, 12 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

"I'm deeply sorry for doing this, I promise my edits will be beneficial instead of completely messing with it and vandalising it."

               -Weatheriscool777

October 2023

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Acroterion (talk) 01:53, 12 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I'll also add that your sandbox has been deleted per U5 as Wikipedia is not a web host for your fantasy hurricane season. I've also rejected your submission of the draft. If all you intend to do is vandalise articles and create made up stuff as article, then Wikipedia is not the place for you as an editor. -- Whpq (talk) 20:36, 12 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add soapboxing, promotional or advertising material to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to 2023 Atlantic hurricane season, you may be blocked from editing. AgisdeSparte (talk) 00:39, 13 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at 2023 Atlantic hurricane season. 🛧Midori No Sora♪🛪 ( ☁＝☁＝✈) 23:39, 24 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:2023 hypothetical hurricane season

A tag has been placed on Draft:2023 hypothetical hurricane season requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

Hypothetical pages are not encyclopedic.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. ~ Hiking Hurricane _(contribs) 19:52, 12 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Weatheriscool777/sandbox

A tag has been placed on User:Weatheriscool777/sandbox requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

Hypothetical pages are not encyclopedic.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. ~ Hiking Hurricane _(contribs) 19:53, 12 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: 2023 hypothetical hurricane season (October 12)

Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Whpq was: This submission is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was: Wikipedia is not a web host for made up hurricane seasons

Whpq (talk) 20:19, 12 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Weatheriscool777! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Whpq (talk) 20:19, 12 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

It was Hypothetical, not nonfiction. Weatheriscool777 (talk) 13:10, 16 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Advice

Please stop using Wikipedia as a free webhost for things you've made up. This is an encyclopedia project. I realize that you're very young, and that you are frustrated, but this is how the real world works, and it's not going to change to suit you. I recommend that you wait a couple of years until you are mature enough to help us out. Acroterion (talk) 01:18, 13 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

To add on to this advice, if you do want to work on hypothetical storms, the Hypothetical Hurricanes Wiki is a better place for it. TornadoLGS (talk) 03:49, 13 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I am going to make new Wikis

I have gotten 2 new Ideas, Hurricane Categories, and bee swarm simulator. Weatheriscool777 (talk) 23:13, 14 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

hurricane categories is already listed at Saffir-Simpson scale Insendieum (talk) 00:35, 16 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Weatheriscool777: WP:DAW. Please see WP:YFA.--Jasper Deng (talk) 00:44, 16 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Categories of hurricanes(Real to hypothetical) (October 14)

Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Phuzion was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia.

Phuzion (talk) 23:28, 14 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Stop the disruption!

You CAN and will be blocked if you continue this! It is not worth it. Stop trying. Insendieum (talk) 23:45, 24 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Insendieum, I’ve already reported this user to the WP:AIV. Clearly WP:NOTHERE. 🛧Midori No Sora♪🛪 ( ☁＝☁＝✈) 23:50, 24 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

October 2023

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for vandalism.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Izno (talk) 23:50, 24 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Weatheriscool777 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Insert your reason to be unblocked here It has been a full year since I was last on this wiki. I am much more mature than I was earlier. I promise with my soul that I won't vandalize the wiki pages anymore.

Decline reason:

This is obviously not truthful. You realise we can see your edit history, right? We can see it hasn't been a full year? Additionally, Confirmed to F0rce 23(Hurricanehunter) which I'll go and block forthwith. Yamla (talk) 21:36, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This acount

This account may or may not come back sometime in the future but must take strict procautions for a while... Weatheriscool777 (talk) 23:40, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Weatheriscool777 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Your reason here this is my 2nd unblock chance. I will right a paragraph full of reasons why I won't vandalise wiki pages, And why I should be unblocked.

First of most, it has been a full year since i've been blocked and now i'm ready to redempt.

I'm much more mature than last time i've visited this website and edited it.

Second of all, over the past couple years of writing i've written over 20 documents.

As of me boosting my skill to write paragraphs like this one.

Next, If I think about vandalizing again I will take it out on a different object or website.

Finally, I promise very clearly I'm willing for the last try.

This time, I WILL NOT EDIT PAGES UNLESS I ASK THE OWNER OF IT. I hope this paragraph will persuade you. Weatheriscool777 (talk) 23:14, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

It's been a little over 10 months, not a year. Articles do not have owners- they are written and owned by the community as a whole. You have also evaded this block, which now means unblocking you won't be considered before six months from today. Further block evasion will reset this timer. I actually don't think you've demonstrated more maturity yet. You furthermore indicate that you don't really have specific edits you want to make and you may not return at all. You have given no reason here to remove the block. 331dot (talk) 08:49, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Please place new posts at the bottom. This may be easier to do if you click "edit" and not "reply". 331dot (talk) 08:49, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

My current block...

lightly for about the past year, I've been blocked. What does that mean? It means it could be another year before they unblock me. It's been a while and I truly have matured in small ways. Someday I might get unblocked and I will make my place right, and set things right. When I get unblocked I won't vandalize even if I'm mad/angry. Weatheriscool777 (talk) 17:25, 6 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Maybe the admins/moderators don't know that I'm not lying. They think I am, but it isn't true. I wasn't lying.

But they are right that I did vandalize the other articles. I'm deeply sorry for that.

If the recent unblock posts didn't persuade you, then this won't. Weatheriscool777 (talk) 17:30, 6 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It wasn't very smart of me to create several different accounts to vandalize and invade the wiki further.

But that was me in the past who was younger, much less mature and self-controllable. Weatheriscool777 (talk) 17:31, 6 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your bad behavior certainly extended to 3 September 2024 when you attempted to mislead us about how long it had been since you had last edited. --Yamla (talk) 22:08, 6 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I was estimating, not trying to fool you guys, it has been about a year since I was banned to be more precise. Weatheriscool777 (talk) 01:46, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Man, I grinded down you guys trust by a lot. At most unban me by February 2025. Weatheriscool777 (talk) 01:47, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I won't give up, and I don't wish to. This is why I've been begging on this Wikipedia for the past week to get unbanned. Weatheriscool777 (talk) 01:49, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

And, I have evidence that I will stop vandalizing and using sockpuppets.

I could quit right a 2-paged paragraph for you guys to unban me.

A normal vandaliser would've given up trying to get unbanned.

But I won't because I will no longer commit such crimes against the community. Weatheriscool777 (talk) 01:52, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Six months from now is 2025-03-07. We expect zero further edits, including to this talk page until then. At that time, you will have to address your previous bad behaviour and will have to address your attempt to mislead us here in September, 2024. ZERO FURTHER EDITS including to this talk page, until then. --Yamla (talk) 09:46, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The time has finally come, I’ve waited 4-5 long, excruciating months for this moment.

I’m finally unblocked, no more getting rejected, and now to be accepted.

(3/7/25) Weatheriscool777 (talk) 13:42, 7 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Remember, you have access to this talk page solely so you can contest your block. Continuing to muck about on it will count against you in any future unblock request and may result in you losing talk page access. --Yamla (talk) 14:15, 7 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Weatheriscool777 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I have been for either a year or more, I've been patient to wait, I can confirm that I did vandalise and use puppet accounts, however this is true but, there is a reason to why unblock requests exist, and that is to unblock ones account who has been blocked for eternity, my reason to unblock is that I previously though that my block previously was unblocked but I was wrong, now it has been truly a year or more since I've been blocked. Weatheriscool777 (talk) 14:30, 7 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

As the user is vociferously protesting the response time to their appeal, I will review this.

Given the user's edit history and continued demeanour, apparent lack of maturity, and this unblock request which, from what I can decipher, boils down to "I've waited a year so unblock me now", I am not convinced it would benefit the project for the block to be lifted at this time. I am therefore declining this appeal.

Before re-appealing (ideally not in the very near future), I recommend the user reads and understands WP:GAB and composes their appeal as instructed there. We will need to see a considerably more compelling appeal than this for it to succeed. DoubleGrazing (talk) 08:52, 13 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Technical data shows Possible block evasion, but my subjective look at the behaviour, combined with the technical data, marks this as unlikely. I therefore indicate the evidence is against any recent block evasion. I'll leave the unblock request to another admin, though. --Yamla (talk) 15:00, 7 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, and thank you for your patience! What would you like to contribute to Wikipedia if you were unblocked? Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 04:17, 8 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I would like to contribute to the following Topics:

Hurricanes/weather phenomenon

Strategical Warfare Weatheriscool777 (talk) 16:47, 8 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

IVE WAITED SO LONG, AND THIS IS WHAT I GET?!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Weatheriscool777 (talk) 15:37, 12 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

COMPLETE SILENCE,THAT'S THE ONLY THING I'M LEFT WITH!!!!!!!!! Weatheriscool777 (talk) 15:38, 12 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You're screaming at the volunteers who you hope will extend you the privilege of being unblocked. What makes you think this will succeed? Y --jpgordon^{𝄢𝄆𝄐𝄇} 16:08, 12 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I wasn't planning on complete solitary silence... Weatheriscool777 (talk) 16:18, 12 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your job is to convince a single volunteer from among our 839 admins to unblock you; none of them are under any obligation to do so. So far, your only argument for being unblocked is that you don't want to be blocked. WP:GAB could be helpful to crafting an effective unblock request. --jpgordon^{𝄢𝄆𝄐𝄇} 19:04, 12 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Here is how I will lengthen my chances of getting unblocked:

1.Persuade them to accept the reasons to why I should be unblocked

2. Ask to be unblocked

3.Get unblocked Weatheriscool777 (talk) 12:08, 13 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

By unblocking me I get to edit and create Wikipedia pages, and like I said earlier there is a reason to why the unblock request feature works, which I've been trying to use it so I can get unblocked, but lately it hasn't been working, more or likely my reasons aren't strong enough. Weatheriscool777 (talk) 19:11, 15 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Persuasive reasons

1.I've been blocked for a year or more

2. I followed admin orders on my talk page, about no longer typing on it until 3/7/25.

3. There is reason to why unblock requesting exists

4. The past is the past, don't forget that people can change and fix their mistakes and no longer do again with it.

5. The most unpersuasive, I would like to edit and create pages that are topics on meteorology, and strategical warfare. Weatheriscool777 (talk) 19:16, 15 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, let's try this again... Weatheriscool777 (talk)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Weatheriscool777 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I'll try again, until I get unblocked in the near future. There is a reason to why this function exists, although it is ineffective and might as well never be used. However, I'll prove reasons to the admins seeing this request. 1. I've waited a full year since I've last been blocked. 2. The past is the past, people can change and fix their damage. 3. By me being unblocked I would edit or create pages that are topics on meteorology, and strategical warfare. 4. I've followed admin orders on my talk page, about no longer typing on it until 3/7/25. Weatheriscool777 (talk) 19:26, 15 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Weatheriscool777: I sincerely appreciate your resilience and your desire to contribute to Wikipedia. I truly empathize with how frustrating it probably is to file multiple unblock requests and have all of them denied.

However, as jpgordon noted, just a week ago you were screaming demands to be unblocked and, while it can be understandable to lose one's cool sometimes, doing so with the great regularity you seem to portends the possibility that your continued editing would create a charged and intense atmosphere for other editors. Blocking is not punitive, but is protective. The specific time period you've been blocked, therefore, is less important than the observable possibility that your unblocking might carry with it risk to the community.

Now, if you were to file another request after a period of time had elapsed that was reasonably sufficient to engage in meaningful reflection of the foregoing, and if that request evidenced a state of mind indicative of successful introspection, I have every confidence you would be unblocked.

I look forward to celebrating your long and successful history editing Wikipedia at some point in the non-present. Thank you, in advance, for your future contributions! Chetsford (talk) 09:18, 21 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

(Non-administrator comment) Hi! Thank you for your patience – showing that you can spend 6 months without socking is something that does help build trust. However, it doesn't mean an unblock is automatic after 6 months. Showing that you understand the reasons for your block (and previous declined unblocks) is also an important part of moving towards a successful unblock request. I see that multiple people above linked you to our guide for appealing blocks, carefully reading it would certainly help your chances.

Above, DoubleGrazing mentioned an apparent lack of maturity as one of the reasons for declining your request. It could be good to show that you can progress on this point, and keep your head cool even in stressful situations like an unblock request. Chaotic Enby (talk · contribs) 00:58, 18 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Lack of maturity was an example of me in the past, when I was first introduced to the Wikipedia website. Weatheriscool777 (talk) 12:35, 18 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your lack of maturity was clearly on show within the past week. You might want to specifically address that. --Yamla (talk) 12:45, 18 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I already have... Weatheriscool777 (talk) 13:47, 18 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

"I wasn't planning on complete solitary silence... " "Ok, let's try this again..." Weatheriscool777 (talk) 13:49, 18 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I think Yamla is talking about comments such as this one. While it's understandable to get stressed about the situation, these reactions can be displeasing for volunteers trying to help you, and acknowledging and addressing that can be a good step forward. Chaotic Enby (talk · contribs) 13:53, 18 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Another thing Admins and users who have overviewed this talk page have not seen or noted was my other reason to why I shouldn't be unblocked, or a question to why The request for unblock feature even exists if it isn't effective. Weatheriscool777 (talk) 13:53, 18 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

But I do agree about my impatience, it was shown a day or two ago, I was for a fact stressed but not willing to give up this account, I am fighting for me to be unblocked and back to better edits than the past, many who have seen my most previous edits disagree because those edits have shown anger and impatience on the wikipedia. Weatheriscool777 (talk) 13:55, 18 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

And those edits destroy trust within the Wikipedia website dismantling my chances of being unblocked, hopefully they will believe me sometime in the near future... Weatheriscool777 (talk) 13:56, 18 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, but the logic in your "there is a reason to why this function exists" point is false. Just because it is possible to appeal against a block, does not mean that you must do so. And if you do (appeal), it furthermore does not mean that your appeal must be accepted. This just gives you an opportunity to make your case, but to succeed, that case must be persuasive. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 14:13, 18 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I knew it was going to take a long time, but not this amount of time. Weatheriscool777 (talk) 14:15, 18 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Most of my reasons were unpersuasive and silly, but I have others as well... Weatheriscool777 (talk) 14:16, 18 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

It wasn't shown in the "guide to appealing blocks" article, but is it possible to have the ability of "request block" blocked if you abuse it? Weatheriscool777 (talk) 14:18, 18 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I was blocked in October 2023, it has been a real full year or more since it is now March 2025, I haven't given up trying to be unblocked, that is one of the reasons that admins and users have not disagreed to. Another reason is maturity, which I haven't shown because of my impatience, which is uncontrollable, in the past when no one even bothered to reply to my comments for 3-4 days decreasing my chances of being unblocked, part of the guide to being unblocked is that I have to state persuasive reasons, which I have very few. Weatheriscool777 (talk) 14:25, 18 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sorry for the situation you find yourself in. One thing that can make a strong case for being unblocked is to show specific edits you want to make. For instance, if you have a specific page in mind to which you want to add content, you can tell us specifically what edit you would like to make (with sources!), and that can show that you can be a helpful and productive editor when unblocked! Chaotic Enby (talk · contribs) 14:28, 18 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

So, in short... you want me to locate incorrect information throughout the topics I have mentioned? Weatheriscool777 (talk) 15:25, 18 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I would Gladly do so... One article I would like to contribute to is the upcoming 2025 hurricane season article... Weatheriscool777 (talk) 15:27, 18 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I already have shown the admins what type of articles I would like to edit. Weatheriscool777 (talk) 15:34, 18 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Yep! If you have specific edits you want to make to that article, that could be great! Chaotic Enby (talk · contribs) 15:57, 18 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Specific edits... I would love to contribute these edits like help track and journal storms/hurricanes. Weatheriscool777 (talk) 16:55, 18 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

But that is the problem... I cant unless Im unblocked, which im not because admins declined my reasonings. Weatheriscool777 (talk) 16:58, 18 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

If you have content you want to add to that page, you can add it here (on your talk page) instead, and that could help provide a stronger reasoning to unblock you. Chaotic Enby (talk · contribs) 17:11, 18 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, I;ve also forgot another eason, that is sockpuppeting, I have recognised within the past 3 months how ineffective and stupid the idea of sockpuppeting as I havnt yet realised that different accounts can have the same IP. Weatheriscool777 (talk) 22:10, 18 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Weatheriscool777 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Unblock Request #5, yes it has been 5 requests yet I havnt achieved much. But what I have realised is that I have my reasons and ways to persuade admins to talk to Izno and unblock me. Ill state this reason, I've been waiting, with patience, I know that I've been using sock puppets, doing vandalism and much more bad things against wikipedia,I have addressed that I will not do this again, for whatever reason in the past my patience was thin and had little to no knowledge about the systems of wikipedia and how they work, I've learned. I've learned that I forgot that during my 1 year block, I was 1 month to early, I forgot the difference between october and september. Another thing I'll address is this, SOckpuppeting is wrong, I didn't know how different accounts did not and will not work, I have realised that all accounts lead to the same IP address. Im sorry, very sorry, however, "sorry" just won't do it for the mass destruction that I've caused. But I'm not giving up, this will either be the last, or the next unblock request.Weatheriscool777 (talk) 21:33, 21 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Concerns regarding maturity and collaboration still exist. Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 00:57, 24 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Talk page

Weatheriscool777, you retain access to this talk page in order to clarify questions you have regarding your block in order to make an appeal. It's not a place for your post whatever pops in to your head.-- Ponyo^{bons mots} 19:56, 21 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Like explaining why I did sockpuppeting and what I didn't know about it? Weatheriscool777 (talk) 21:11, 21 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

It was clear that I had no idea in the past that different accounts line up to the same IP address. Weatheriscool777 (talk) 21:13, 21 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, that one is on me, I advised them that giving examples of constructive edits they would like to make in the future could be helpful to strengthen their unblock request (as Significa liberdade asked them what they would like to contribute to if unblocked). However, in retrospect, it might not be the most urgent priority, especially since addressing behavioral issues also plays a role in the unblock. Chaotic Enby (talk · contribs) 21:59, 21 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I was starting to run low on Ideas, so my best bet is to gather more information and reasons to why I should be unblocked. Weatheriscool777 (talk) 22:11, 21 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Scheiße, Dlaczego IO なれ разблокирован?

Your ability to edit this talk page has been revoked as an administrator has identified your talk page edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive.

(block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System.
Please note that there could be appeals to the Unblock Ticket Request System that have been declined leading to the posting of this notice.