User talk:VeryAlive

September 2020

Hello, I'm Geraldo Perez. I noticed that you made an edit concerning content related to a living (or recently deceased) person on Emily Alyn Lind, but you didn't support your changes with a citation to a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now. Wikipedia has a very strict policy concerning how we write about living people, so please help us keep such articles accurate and clear. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! Geraldo Perez (talk) 05:11, 26 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Geraldo Perez. I noticed that you recently removed content from Judah Lewis without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Geraldo Perez (talk) 05:14, 26 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

June 2021

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, but a recent edit of yours to the page Milo Yiannopoulos has an edit summary that appears to be inaccurate or inappropriate. The summaries are helpful to people browsing an article's history, so it is important that you use edit summaries that accurately tell other editors what you did. Feel free to use the sandbox to make test edits. Thank you. GorillaWarfare (she/her • talk) 14:22, 24 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

March 2022

Multiple news articles referred to Seiger using she/her pronouns and I can't find a single source that referred her with they/them pronouns. It's the same consistency with Jessie Mei Li, who also uses she/they pronouns.

Sources:

https://lawandorder.fandom.com/wiki/Ainsley_Seiger

https://www.looper.com/787174/why-ainsley-seiger-will-be-happy-to-see-dylan-mcdermott-leave-law-order-organized-crime-exclusive/

https://www.eonline.com/news/1320819/meet-ainsley-seiger-law-order-organized-crimes-rising-star

https://www.newsobserver.com/entertainment/tv/warm-tv-blog/article251326393.html VeryAlive (talk) 16:22, 9 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Except Seiger themself has indicated the preference and there's no reason to change it back when reliable sources haven't said they don't use they/them. Fandom is a Wiki, Eonline might be OK, but not sure on the other two for a BLP Star Mississippi 17:18, 9 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

July 2023

Hello, I'm GoneIn60. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Jurassic World Dominion, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. GoneIn60 (talk) 10:18, 19 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:46, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Conclave

At this point in the plot, they don't know the nature of the medical appointment.
The citation is there to support the mention of the Holy Spirit, which was previously missing. It seems like lots of viewers missed this. Deb (talk) 16:27, 9 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Does it have to be an explicitly extremely negative review of the film from a biased website that is explicitly trashing it while making an obvious factual error? Is it a reliable source? At least remove the citation, please, or find a better one. VeryAlive (talk) 16:29, 9 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
It looks like a reliable source to me, but I'll look for another - all reviewers are biased in one way or another. Deb (talk) 16:34, 9 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]