User talk:Username0018

October 2021

Hello, I'm Notfrompedro. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Colette of Corbie have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse. Thanks. Notfrompedro (talk) 13:13, 7 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Colette of Corbie. Your edits continue to appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted.

If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place {{Help me}} on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Colette of Corbie was changed by Username0018 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.956479 on 2021-10-07T13:54:27+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 13:54, 7 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Barnabas, you may be blocked from editing. Notfrompedro (talk) 14:00, 7 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Notification: Blocked

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for Vandalism. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding

{{unblock|I should be unblocked because, I was hacked on wikipedia and sorry for the false vandalism from the wrong user of this account. Note: This is not the HACKER that was mentioned in this reasoning, this is the owner of this account, Thank you!}}

below this notice. Materialscientist (talk) 14:00, 7 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Username0018 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I should be unblocked because, I was hacked on wikipedia and sorry for the false vandalism from the wrong user of this account. Note: This is not the HACKER that was mentioned in this reasoning, this is the owner of this account, Thank you!

Decline reason:

Thanks for letting us know. As per WP:COMPROMISED, this account is no longer eligible for unblock consideration. I also see you were unable to keep your account secure for even a full 60 seconds, so WP:CIR applies (or you are lying). Yamla (talk) 15:04, 7 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.