User talk:Tuffmaster

Unblock Request #1

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sockpuppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sockpuppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 20:33, 24 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not Surya222 hes from Kirkuk I'm from erbil, we are not the same person. Hes assyrian im a kurd. He knows arabic i don't. I literally am not him Tuffmaster (talk) 21:11, 24 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Tuffmaster (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I am not Surya222, i put that in my user page because historyofiran in my talk page asked if i was surya222."click here". i can try to contact him and tell him to vouch that i am not him

this is a screenshot of me and him. Tuffmaster (talk) 21:17, 24 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

No, you don't appear to be Suraya. You are definitely Kurdo7aladen (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki). Izno (talk) 16:40, 25 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Turns out he can't vouch

or on Wikipedia, but i have his tiktok i will tell him there to vouch for mef Tuffmaster (talk) 21:30, 24 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Tuffmaster (talk) 21:17, 24 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Clearly, you know this person pretty well, which means there's something you're not telling us.

In any case, give me 15 minutes in Photoshop and I can produce a screenshot of me talking to Santa Claus. CoffeeCrumbs (talk) 22:19, 24 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

i know him, but I'm not him, i will literally show you the screen shots with time stamps on my phone Tuffmaster (talk) 22:51, 24 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

In addition to being a confirmed sockpuppet of Kurdo7aladen, which you will need to address to be unblocked, you will need to address concerns of WP:MEAT with respect to Suraya222, which are as much a concern as sockpuppetry. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 16:41, 25 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

what do you mean confirmed sock puppet? I don't even know Kurdo7aladen Tuffmaster (talk) 09:35, 29 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Suraya222 please for the love of God tell them that me and you are different people Tuffmaster

Unblock request #2

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Tuffmaster (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

i want to politely request to have my block reconsidered, because I think that it's unreasonable and a mistake, because of these reasons regarding me being a sock:
1. I'm not Kurdo7aladen, I've never heard of that guy before. Nor have I interacted with him before.
2. I'm not suraya 222, he mentioned in his talk page that we are separate people. And i have mentioned it too, he even confirmed the authenticity our screenshot, as proof of being different people.

i want to have a review of the block and to reconsider the block, as i believe that i am a victim of collateral damage because i am not a sock puppet of Kurdo7aladen. I have mentioned earlier that i do not know the guy, there's zero evidence to suggest that I'm Kurdo7aladen, because i am not him. I have no association with him, and genuinely don't know him.

I do have to say that, i am deeply sorry for the inconvenience i have caused for my dear friend Suraya222, and for the inconvenience i have caused to Wikipedia moderators. I hope that my block can be reviewed and that I will get unblocked. Tuffmaster (talk) 23:28, 29 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You don't have to have talked with someone or even know someone to be a sock puppet- this is called meat puppetry. When an account does something that others have been blocked for, it will be blocked itself as we have no way of knowing who is sitting at the computer operating an account. It's not difficult for someone to fake a social media conversation so I find that unpersuasive- but even if that's an authentic conversation it only shows you have some sort of relationship with them. I am declining your request. 331dot (talk) 09:04, 30 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

@331dot: i wouldn't have edited his draft if i knew he was blocked, i found on on June 24th that he was blocked, he sent me the link to his draft on june 23rd and asked me if it looked fine, i told it did and he needed to know add links to the infobox. (which i edited his darft to make it easier for him to complete, not knowing he was blocked) he didn't ask me to edit his page, i did not do meat puppeting even tho it may seem like it. Tuffmaster (Tuffmaster) 1 July 2025 10:54 (UTC)

Unblock request #3

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Tuffmaster (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

this will be my third and hopefully final unblock request, I just want to he unblocked.
i did not coordinate edits with suraya222, he showed me his draft, he asked me what it needed, i said he needed to add links to the infobox, he didn't do it, so i did it in good faith. He did not ask me to edit it for him, nor did he say anything. That's it, i did my edit in good faith.
And please reconsider my block, i have some things i want to add on Islamic history. Tuffmaster (talk) 00:07, 7 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

What you are describing is sockpuppetry. Yamla (talk) 10:17, 7 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Unblock request #4

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Tuffmaster (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

i just want a revision of my block, i get vague declines that are not related to the unblock request.

Example #1 during my last unblock request on here, i addressed meatpuppetry concerns, and my decline reason said this "what you are describing is sockpuppetry" and respectfully, it is a pointless decline reason. if he said he felt like i should be blocked, i would have actually accepted it. But this was not even related to the unblock request.

Example #2 in my first unblock request, "no, you don't appear to be suraya. you're definitely Kurdo7aladen" this is (and i say this respectfully) a strong accusation, that was said with no sources provided. i have stated before and i will say again, I'm not Kurdo7aladen. But honestly it's getting tiresome, i am not a sockpuppet, nor am i a meatpuppet.

Let me address them here:

Sockpuppetry concern #1 i am not him (suraya222) [https://en.m.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Draft:Attempt_to_Subdue_The_Assyrians_(1841)&action=history i edited his Draft 5 minutes after him], why would anyone create a new account just do a edit, on a draft they were on? And before you say he was blocked, he was blocked two hours after the edit. Also i didn't coordinate edits with him, i just gave him a feedback on his Draft, he didn't do it, so i did it instead of him in good faith.

Sockpuppetry concern #2

I also am not Kurdo7aladen, we don't even have the same ip address. in his talk page he said 185.106.28.156 was his ip, which is in the middle of erbil. My ip is 185.24.61.65 which is based in koya

Meatpuppetry Concern

I did not coordinate edits with suraya222, i gave him a feedback on this draft. I told him what he needed to add, he said he will look into it, but didn't edit it. So i decided to edit it instead of him with good faith. I wanted to make his Draft easier to be completed, that's seriously it.

i just want a serious revision on my block, and If I stay blocked i want a clear reason on why i should remain blocked. Anyways, thanks for your time. Have a great dayTuffmaster (talk) 19:53, 8 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You are clearly either sock- or meat-puppeting based on the evidence provided and your own conflicting explanations. In any event, you have not demonstrated that you can edit productively. voorts (talk/contributions) 00:37, 27 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Tuffmaster (talk) 19:53, 8 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]