User talk:Truffle2022

21st March 2023

Welcome to Wikipedia. You edit on the article of Reform UK has been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox.

Thank you very much.

Malmsimp (talk) 11:48, 21 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop deleting Reform UK's ideology; this is ideology warrior beviour and edit warring. If you think it should be removed please make a case on the talk page. Thank you. — Czello 12:04, 22 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

As the Party consist of members from both sides of the political spectrum and its manifesto includes part nationalisation as well as the party organisers seeing the Party as not described as right wing, why do you believe otherwise? It is made up of members originally from both sides of the political spectrum I do not see any problem describing the party through its membership and its policies. On what grounds would you disagree? Truffle2022 (talk) 14:45, 22 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This is WP:OR. We go by what reliable sources say, which describe the party as right-wing populist. — Czello 14:45, 22 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

March 2023

Your recent editing history at Reform UK shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. — Czello 12:06, 22 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Reform UK, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Materialscientist (talk) 12:10, 22 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:Truffle2022 reported by User:Czello (Result: ). Thank you. — Czello 12:11, 22 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

March 2023

You have been blocked from editing from certain pages (Reform UK, Reform UK (Political Party), Reform UK Scotland, and Reform UK election results) for a period of 24 hours for Edit warring and making unsourced edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Courcelles (talk) 12:56, 22 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]