User talk:Transcedent

Disambiguation link notification for January 19

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Opinion polling for the 2026 Peruvian general election, links pointing to the disambiguation pages were Paul James and Antonio Ortiz. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 19:51, 19 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

January 2026

Please do not use styles that are nonstandard, unusual, inappropriate or difficult to understand in articles, as you did in Opinion polling for the 2026 Peruvian general election. There is a Manual of Style, and edits should not deliberately go against it without special reason. Thank you. Sumanuil. _{(talk to me)} 09:26, 20 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Formal concern regarding NPOV and WP:PRESERVE on Peruvian polling data Transcedent (talk) 11:07, 20 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

WTH does that even mean? And what do those policies have to do with cleaning up the mess you made? Sumanuil. _{(talk to me)} 19:58, 20 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Formal concern regarding NPOV and WP:PRESERVE on Peruvian polling data

Transcedent (talk) 11:02, 20 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Warning

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Opinion polling for the 2026 Peruvian general election.

Please stop your disruptive edits. You have been reverted multiple times by many different editors, and your repeated efforts to continue are not helpful. Cilidus (talk) 12:05, 20 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:Transcedent reported by User:Sumanuil (Result: ). Thank you. Sumanuil. _{(talk to me)} 05:37, 21 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

January 2026

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 72 hours for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you believe that there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 07:28, 21 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

February 2026

Hello, I'm FantasticWikiUser. An edit that you recently made to Opinion polling for the 2026 Peruvian general election seemed to be a test and has been reverted. If you want to practice editing, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! FantasticWikiUser (talk) 16:31, 2 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]