User talk:Timmath
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did at 2016 Turkish coup d'état attempt, you may be blocked from editing. Thank you. TimothyJosephWood 19:45, 26 July 2016 (UTC)
July 2016
[edit]RESPONSE Wikipedia is portrayed as (and used to be) a platform where people from around the world could contribute an unbiased information but clearly it has turned into one that is controlled by well funded groups working for the few owners of the increasingly large number of media outlets with view to shape the world opinion along their narrative. This concerted effort to use Wikipedia for corroborating their publications is very clear because of the high level biased information that has been copied from the same media, with token weak counter-views in order to mislead the unsuspecting readers that Wikipedia remains a non-biased medium. The intolerance exercised by the "moderators" to prevent other contributors by blocking their accounts is another example of why Wikipedia is no longer what it used to be. Blocking my account without addressing my concerns proves my point as blocking a contributor's account makes the account effectively useless. Political content in Wikipedia increasingly parallels that of the biased media and does not represent a NPOV.
Why don't you address what I have stated as the reason for my editing to improve the page instead of threatening to block me when I correctly state that certain passages and referenced articles violate the Wikipedia rules (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:NPOV -- Information added to this article must be compliant with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Accordingly, information on the article's subject MUST be reported from a neutral point of view and be free of any type of Original Research.)?
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia, as you did at 2016 Turkish coup d'état attempt. Dr. K. 19:52, 26 July 2016 (UTC)
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be repeatedly reverting or undoing other editors' contributions. Although this may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is known as "edit warring" and is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, as it often creates animosity between editors. Instead of reverting, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus on the talk page.
If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to lose editing privileges. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, and violating the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a loss of editing privileges. Thank you. NeilN talk to me 20:03, 26 July 2016 (UTC)
Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion
[edit]
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. TimothyJosephWood 20:32, 26 July 2016 (UTC)
Blocked
[edit]
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. Lord Roem ~ (talk) 06:07, 27 July 2016 (UTC)