User talk:Thedavemaster

July 2010

Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. One of the core policies of Wikipedia is that articles should always be written from a neutral point of view. A contribution you made to Bradley Orr appears to carry a non-neutral point of view, and your edit may have been changed or reverted to correct the problem. Please remember to observe this important core policy. Thank you. Biker Biker (talk) 07:46, 29 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Chelsea F.C.. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Reconsider ! 11:14, 31 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This is the final warning you will receive regarding your disruptive edits. The next time you violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by inserting commentary or your personal analysis into an article, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Reconsider ! 11:19, 31 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for vandalism. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{[[Template:|]]}}, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first.

Materialscientist (talk) 11:23, 31 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Thedavemaster (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I am sorry for what I have done I realise this might be hurtful for people who do not support my view I am sorry for what I have done and will not do it again please can I have another chance please.

Decline reason:

Why are you only sorry now? You were repeatedly warned and continued to vandalize, it's only after you were actually blocked that you were "sorry." You weren't blocked for hurting anyone's feelings anyway, you were blocked for vandalism. Please address that concern if you wish to be unblocked. Beeblebrox (talk) 17:07, 2 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Vandalism

Vandalism degrades article quality and creates work for other editors. Your case has been reviewed by an administrator, who has declined your request to be unblocked because you have not shown you appreciate that. Vandalism is a cheap thrill. I recommend, if you ever get unblocked, that you try the subtler but much deeper and enduring pleasure of improving an article. It can be addictive, it's a good way to master a topic, and you get to hang out with some really decent, knowledgable people. Anthony (talk) 19:24, 2 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]