Jump to content

User talk:The Parsnip!/Archive Dec 2007

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Signpost updated for November 26th, 2007.

[edit]
The Wikipedia Signpost
The Wikipedia Signpost
Weekly Delivery



Volume 3, Issue 48 26 November 2007 About the Signpost

Arbitration Committee elections: Candidate profiles WikiWorld comic: "Cursive"
News and notes: Ombudsman commission, fundraiser, milestones Wikipedia in the News
WikiProject Report: Education in Australia Features and admins
Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News The Report on Lengthy Litigation

Home  |  Archives  |  Newsroom  |  Tip Line  |  Single-Page View Shortcut : WP:POST

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 08:44, 27 November 2007 (UTC) [reply]

Sander

[edit]

Widely reported or not. This just recently happened and spreading the word that she was a porn star, and giving out her stage name, and her website are going way to far. Just keep it that she was a college student that went missing. It's called respect.Metal Head 15:02, 30 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

  • Exactly, this is an encyclopedia, that is why only the actual important facts should remain. Blabbing that she was a porn star and adding tags of american porn star/female porn star is not encyclopedia worthy. The fact that she was murdered is enclycopedia worthy. Giving out her website, for one, could actually hurt matters as it would draw bad attention.Metal Head 15:05, 30 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
    • It being reported on the news does not make it worthy of an enclycopedia. If there is a fender bender on the news it will not be in an encyclopedia. The fact that they have "widely reported" her website does not give basis to add it to the enclylopedia either. The fact that she was a porn star is not relevant.Metal Head 15:11, 30 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  • You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Emily Sander. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. Metal Head 15:11, 30 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Saugeen

[edit]

Thank you for going to bat for the article I originally wrote. I made some comments on that talk page. The actions of some of the admins here absolutely disgust me, and have been the sole reason I have not posted a thing here in nearly 2 years. Tokyojoe2002 21:00, 30 November 2007 (UTC) [reply]

Signpost updated for December 3rd, 2007.

[edit]
The Wikipedia Signpost
The Wikipedia Signpost
Weekly Delivery



Volume 3, Issue 49 3 December 2007 About the Signpost

Features and admins
Features and admins

Home  |  Archives  |  Newsroom  |  Tip Line  |  Single-Page View Shortcut : WP:POST

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 10:13, 4 December 2007 (UTC) [reply]

Signpost updated for December 10th, 2007.

[edit]
The Wikipedia Signpost
The Wikipedia Signpost
Weekly Delivery



Volume 3, Issue 50 10 December 2007 About the Signpost

Features and admins
Features and admins

Home  |  Archives  |  Newsroom  |  Tip Line  |  Single-Page View Shortcut : WP:POST

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 08:08, 12 December 2007 (UTC) [reply]

A Quick Thanks...

[edit]

...for the fair use rational you added to Image:DHS Warrior Logo.svg. I uploaded that long before I understood fair-use and wouldn't have been back in time to save it from deletion! Much thanks and happy editing! --omtay38 20:51, 17 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Signpost updated for December 17th, 2007.

[edit]
The Wikipedia Signpost
The Wikipedia Signpost
Weekly Delivery



Volume 3, Issue 51 17 December 2007 About the Signpost

WikiProject report
WikiProject Report: Plants
Features and admins
Features and admins

Home  |  Archives  |  Newsroom  |  Tip Line  |  Single-Page View Shortcut : WP:POST

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 19:42, 18 December 2007 (UTC) [reply]

discordia

[edit]

You may like to read Talk:Murder of Emily Sander#External Links Debate to see why references and links to discordia are repudiated. p2pnet does not offer any unique insights that are not available from other less-contentious websites. 203.220.10.226 (talk) 22:54, 26 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]