User talk:TahiHasan

Vandalism Warning

Regarding your edit to Mohammad A. Arafat page - Hello, I'm Arknights12. I noticed that you recently removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Arknights12 (talk) 17:59, 24 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Vandalism Warning

Regarding your edits to Mohammad A. Arafat page- Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Arknights12 (talk) 18:40, 2 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Vandalism Warning

Regarding your recent edits to Mohammad A. Arafat page, I believe you are engaging in subtle vandalism- You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you make unexplained changes to information on Wikipedia. Arknights12 (talk) 06:56, 6 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I have been contributing to this discussion with explanations and without bias. However, I have noticed repeated warnings directed at me without valid justification. At the same time, edits are being made to the page that appear to reflect bias. Wikipedia's guidelines emphasize neutrality, and I believe all contributions should be evaluated fairly based on these principles. TahiHasan (talk) 07:08, 6 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

an example of your bias is removing the word "brutal" from the repression of protest despite being clearly referenced. These subtle vandalism are harder to catch and unwanted. The earlier warnings were for clear vandalism, this one is for subtle vandalism. Arknights12 (talk) 07:44, 6 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Arknights12: Removing the word "brutal" is not "vandalism". See WP:NOTVANDAL. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 15:23, 11 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

sorry about that. Didn't know it. Arknights12 (talk) 16:44, 15 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Introduction to contentious topics

You have recently edited a page related to articles about living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have an expanded level of powers and discretion in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
follow editorial and behavioural best practices;
comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
refrain from gaming the system.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures, you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.

Doug Weller talk 21:17, 7 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked as a sockpuppet

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively as a sockpuppet of User:ArafatHassanWiKi per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/ArafatHassanWiKi. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.

Izno (talk) 04:05, 19 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]