User talk:Sync!

November 2024

Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia. Wikipedia is not a collection of links, nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include, but are not limited to, links to personal websites, links to websites with which you are affiliated (whether as a link in article text, or a citation in an article), and links that attract visitors to a website or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam guideline for further explanations. Because Wikipedia uses the nofollow attribute value, its external links are disregarded by most search engines. If you feel the link should be added to the page, please discuss it on the associated talk page rather than re-adding it. [1] MrOllie (talk) 12:05, 8 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did at Dalbergia odorifera, you may be blocked from editing. It is considered spamming and Wikipedia is not a vehicle for advertising or promotion. Because Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, additions of links to Wikipedia will not alter search engine rankings. Declangi (talk) 10:23, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked for sockpuppetry

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Sync!. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you believe that there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. asilvering (talk) 08:02, 19 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock Request

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Sync! (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Hello, administrators i kindly request to please remove the block on my account or consider converting it into a temporary block. I want to make it clear that I have never taken part in any illegal or disruptive activity. My intention has always been to contribute positively to Wikipedia.

I’ve spent a good editing time. If any of my actions were misunderstood or unintentionally went against the guidelines, I truly apologize. It was never meant to cause any harm. Please consider unblocking me. Sync! (talk) 17:10, 21 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

The block is indefinite, not permanent, which only means you must convince an admin to remove it. Putting an arbitrary end date on the block does nothing in terms of you demonstrating your understanding of the reasons for the block; we don't want you to just wait it out. Please specifically speak to the reason for the block. 331dot (talk) 19:29, 21 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Unblock Request

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Sync! (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Hello, administrators, I kindly request you to please remove the block on my account. I understand the block is due to using multiple accounts. I truly apologize if any of my actions caused confusion. I’ve always committed to contribute in good way to Wikipedia and will follow the rules more carefully going forward. I am only learning from other contributors, which is why my activities might seem suspicious, but I have nothing to do with anyone else, and I always edit in good faith so Please consider unblocking me.

Sync! (talk) 18:24, 24 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You have used multiple accounts to take part in AfD discussions, that is certainly abusive behaviour. And you've done it multiple times, so you can't even claim that it was a one-off accident. Furthermore, the fact that you're trying to appeal against the blocks on at least two of your accounts indicates intention to continue in the same vein.

Your sockpuppetry is not the only, but the gravest charge against you, so in your next appeal (if any) you really want to focus on explaining that, and convincing us that it is safe to unblock. Currently, you're very far from succeeding. DoubleGrazing (talk) 06:10, 25 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Sync! (talk) 18:24, 24 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Request Unblock

This user is asking that their block be reviewed:

Sync! (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Dear! Team, there are people in my household who contribute to Wikipedia, and I am the most active contributor among them. I am aware of Wikipedia’s guidelines. However, sometimes other members of my household participated in editing or AfD discussions, as they were also learning i understand the block is due to using multiple accounts. I assure you that from now, I will make sure this does not happen again. I kindly request to you please unblock me. Sync! (talk) 18:44, 25 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Notes:

In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.

Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=Dear! Team, there are people in my household who contribute to Wikipedia, and I am the most active contributor among them. I am aware of Wikipedia’s guidelines. However, sometimes other members of my household participated in editing or AfD discussions, as they were also learning i understand the block is due to using multiple accounts. I assure you that from now, I will make sure this does not happen again. I kindly request to you please unblock me.
[[User:Sync!|Sync!]] ([[User talk:Sync!#top|talk]]) 18:44, 25 June 2025 (UTC) |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=Dear! Team, there are people in my household who contribute to Wikipedia, and I am the most active contributor among them. I am aware of Wikipedia’s guidelines. However, sometimes other members of my household participated in editing or AfD discussions, as they were also learning i understand the block is due to using multiple accounts. I assure you that from now, I will make sure this does not happen again. I kindly request to you please unblock me.
[[User:Sync!|Sync!]] ([[User talk:Sync!#top|talk]]) 18:44, 25 June 2025 (UTC) |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=Dear! Team, there are people in my household who contribute to Wikipedia, and I am the most active contributor among them. I am aware of Wikipedia’s guidelines. However, sometimes other members of my household participated in editing or AfD discussions, as they were also learning i understand the block is due to using multiple accounts. I assure you that from now, I will make sure this does not happen again. I kindly request to you please unblock me.
[[User:Sync!|Sync!]] ([[User talk:Sync!#top|talk]]) 18:44, 25 June 2025 (UTC) |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}

Please see meat puppetry. 331dot (talk) 10:03, 26 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Others acted on their own after watching me edits and I take full responsibility and give my word it won’t be repeated. Sync! (talk) 11:58, 26 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Even if we assume, purely for the sake of the argument, that all your accounts were operated by different family members, there clearly was external coordination taking place. For example at this Articles for deletion/Akash Singh Rajput discussion, three of the accounts came to defend an article that one of you had created. That would still make it meatpuppetry, the definition of which you will find in the comment above this. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 12:44, 26 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Sir, I understand your concern regarding the AfD discussion i sincerely want to clarify that I did not coordinate or ask anyone to participate. may have acted after seeing my activity but there was no intentional planning but now i realize that this kind of involvement even unintentionally can be a meatpuppetry.

I take full responsibility and assure you this will not happen again. I have already spoken to my family members i will make sure that only I contribute from my end, strictly following the guidelines.

Kindly consider this explanation and give me a chance to continue editing under WP:AGF. I would also like you to closely monitor all my activities. This will help me receive proper guidance and if at any point you feel I am doing something wrong you may block me immediately. Sync! (talk) 15:46, 26 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]