User talk:Sturm 1
April 2025
[edit]
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 11:32, 24 April 2025 (UTC)- @ScottishFinnishRadish
- according to who? Sturm 1 (talk) 12:12, 24 April 2025 (UTC)
- Memorializing a school shooter and trolling are not acceptable ways to contribute. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 12:25, 24 April 2025 (UTC)
- @ScottishFinnishRadish
- I am not memorialising anyone. If you mean the notable YouTube suspension thing, that's pure contribution, and of course those need to be preserved. And I have moved on from school shooting as a topic so can the past leave me alone? and I have not trolled, and if I have, not intentionally. Won't do it again Sturm 1 (talk) 12:29, 24 April 2025 (UTC)
- Memorializing a school shooter and trolling are not acceptable ways to contribute. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 12:25, 24 April 2025 (UTC)
Appeal.
[edit]
Sturm 1 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
What do you mean by not here to build an encyclopaedia? Yes, I might make some edits what the majority of Wikipedia does not want, but am I immediately doomed to being "not here to build an encyclopaedia" after that? The answer should be absolute no. I am not obliged to anything. I am one of those occasional users who build articles or edit them, I am not a Wikiholic or a person who vandalises. I have dealt with this same problem before, and I do not understand why the hell are you doing this to me? Sturm 1 (talk) 12:17, 24 April 2025 (UTC)
Decline reason:
This is an angry rant that shows you don't have, and aren't likely to have, the right mindset to edit Wikipedia. It also seems like this isn't your first account("I have dealt with this same problem before"). 331dot (talk) 12:45, 24 April 2025 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
appeal 2
[edit]Sturm 1 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I might make some edits what the majority of Wikipedia does not want, but I should not be doomed because of it. I am one of those occasional users who build articles or edit them, I am not a Wikiholic or a person who vandalises. I have dealt with this same problem before, and I do not understand why are you doing this to me? Therefore I appeal this. And PS. this is not a rant or an angry one. I am calm when writing this. I promise not to do whatever I was blocked for again. Thanks for understanding. Sturm 1 (talk) 13:12, 24 April 2025 (UTC)
Decline reason:
This does not attempt to address the concern around multiple accounts, nor is it meaningfully different from your previous, declined, unblock request. Yamla (talk) 15:07, 24 April 2025 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
appeal 3 and probably the final of them all, now answering the concerns
[edit]
Sturm 1 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Notes:
- In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
- Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.
If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:
{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=OK so I am one of those Wikipedia users who occasionally use Wikipedia and edit or create articles, without being active every day etc, so my edits might not always be matching the standards, and I am still learning, and my edits might be even about radical stuff but I am doing the absolute best to keep it appropriate and matching the standards. I wish I could answer the previous appeal comments but I can't so I will have to appeal the third time. So now let's get to the concerns of "dealing with this before" and so, I want to say that yes, I have dealt with this blocking stuff before, but only on this account but it hasn't ever happened on English Wikipedia, it has happened on the Finnish Wikipedia and it happened in May 2022 and was eventually settled as I learnt the standards of Finnish Wikipedia. English Wikipedia is not something I use often so I don't know many standards, so that's why my edits can be unmatching compared to the standards. I apologise for any "disruptive" edits I potentially have made, I won't do those again. I agree I should start learning the standards of English Wikipedia more before editing, that's what I'm going to do if you approve my appeal. I am really sorry for anything. I wish you all can understand and maybe unblock me. Yeah I can't really know what will follow this appeal but I hope the concerns were explained and all that. I am not ranting or anything. Thank you for reviewing this appeal whatever ending it will bring. If this gets denied, I will just serve the indefinite time and maybe appeal in the future, but I made my points now. Thanks. [[User:Sturm 1|Sturm 1]] ([[User talk:Sturm 1#top|talk]]) 16:55, 24 April 2025 (UTC) |3 = ~~~~}}
If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.
{{unblock reviewed |1=OK so I am one of those Wikipedia users who occasionally use Wikipedia and edit or create articles, without being active every day etc, so my edits might not always be matching the standards, and I am still learning, and my edits might be even about radical stuff but I am doing the absolute best to keep it appropriate and matching the standards. I wish I could answer the previous appeal comments but I can't so I will have to appeal the third time. So now let's get to the concerns of "dealing with this before" and so, I want to say that yes, I have dealt with this blocking stuff before, but only on this account but it hasn't ever happened on English Wikipedia, it has happened on the Finnish Wikipedia and it happened in May 2022 and was eventually settled as I learnt the standards of Finnish Wikipedia. English Wikipedia is not something I use often so I don't know many standards, so that's why my edits can be unmatching compared to the standards. I apologise for any "disruptive" edits I potentially have made, I won't do those again. I agree I should start learning the standards of English Wikipedia more before editing, that's what I'm going to do if you approve my appeal. I am really sorry for anything. I wish you all can understand and maybe unblock me. Yeah I can't really know what will follow this appeal but I hope the concerns were explained and all that. I am not ranting or anything. Thank you for reviewing this appeal whatever ending it will bring. If this gets denied, I will just serve the indefinite time and maybe appeal in the future, but I made my points now. Thanks. [[User:Sturm 1|Sturm 1]] ([[User talk:Sturm 1#top|talk]]) 16:55, 24 April 2025 (UTC) |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}
If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:
{{unblock reviewed |1=OK so I am one of those Wikipedia users who occasionally use Wikipedia and edit or create articles, without being active every day etc, so my edits might not always be matching the standards, and I am still learning, and my edits might be even about radical stuff but I am doing the absolute best to keep it appropriate and matching the standards. I wish I could answer the previous appeal comments but I can't so I will have to appeal the third time. So now let's get to the concerns of "dealing with this before" and so, I want to say that yes, I have dealt with this blocking stuff before, but only on this account but it hasn't ever happened on English Wikipedia, it has happened on the Finnish Wikipedia and it happened in May 2022 and was eventually settled as I learnt the standards of Finnish Wikipedia. English Wikipedia is not something I use often so I don't know many standards, so that's why my edits can be unmatching compared to the standards. I apologise for any "disruptive" edits I potentially have made, I won't do those again. I agree I should start learning the standards of English Wikipedia more before editing, that's what I'm going to do if you approve my appeal. I am really sorry for anything. I wish you all can understand and maybe unblock me. Yeah I can't really know what will follow this appeal but I hope the concerns were explained and all that. I am not ranting or anything. Thank you for reviewing this appeal whatever ending it will bring. If this gets denied, I will just serve the indefinite time and maybe appeal in the future, but I made my points now. Thanks. [[User:Sturm 1|Sturm 1]] ([[User talk:Sturm 1#top|talk]]) 16:55, 24 April 2025 (UTC) |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}