User talk:StevenTHS

September 2017

Please stop inserting a subject into the September 29 article who has no Wikipedia article. Especially where the subject's name is suspiciously close to your user name. Continuing to edit like this could lead to your being blocked from editing Wikipedia at all. David in DC (talk) 16:44, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Widr (talk) 17:00, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

StevenTHS (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I have read the guide to appealing blocks. StevenTHS (talk) 08:45, 30 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

That's a start, but to get yourself unblocked you will need to make it clear that you understand why you are blocked and that you will not repeat your problematic behaviour. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 09:04, 30 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

StevenTHS (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I understand why I am blocked and that I will not repeat my problematic behaviour. StevenTHS (talk) 09:12, 30 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Yamla (talk) 11:15, 30 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

People often say they understand here when, in fact, the often do not and often go back to the same behaviour. So rather than just saying you understand, please explain what was wrong and explain what you will do instead if unblocked. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 11:51, 30 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

StevenTHS (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

The block is no longer necessary because I understand what I have been blocked for, I will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and I will make useful contributions instead. StevenTHS (talk) 07:41, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

More is required than simply rephrasing your last decline reason. PhilKnight (talk) 01:18, 2 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

For continued disruptive behaviour while blocked, I have extended this block to indefinite and revoked your talk page access. If your current unblock request is declined, that leaves you with WP:UTRS. --Yamla (talk) 11:21, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I concur - StevenTHS has sent me thanks for my last 10 edits to my own talk page and I was considering the same response as Yamla's. I presume the trolling has been continuing elsewhere too. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 11:26, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

StevenTHS (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

The block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia. 113.210.119.6 (talk) 04:17, 15 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Apparently, it is. You need to use WP:UTRS, not IP sock puppets. I will include a template that explains this. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 06:17, 15 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Your ability to edit this talk page has been revoked as an administrator has identified your talk page edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive.

(block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System. If the block is a CheckUser or Oversight block, was made by the Arbitration Committee or to enforce an arbitration decision (arbitration enforcement), or is unsuitable for public discussion, you should appeal to the Arbitration Committee.
Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the post of this notice.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

StevenTHS (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I have submitted a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System. 113.210.232.126 (talk) 07:43, 15 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Unblock requests from logged-out IP address can not be accepted. And you will not be unblocked while you have been persistently evading your block and adding yourself to February 27. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 08:24, 15 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.