User talk:SteveQS

recent edit

Howdy,

Your edits didn't supply sources, weren't explained, and broke markup. please use the sandbox for test edits, and source and cite your edits correctly. thanks in advance, Augmented Seventh 🎱 18:52, 3 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

SteveQS, I can't help noticing that a large proportion of your recent and very bold edits have been reverted, by multiple other editors. This suggests that you are editing outside normal parameters. It might well be best if you practice editing in small steps, starting with things that are non-controversial. New claims need to be supported by reliable sources, which means peer-reviewed articles in major scientific journals, monographs, or serious textbooks. Papers published on the web are far more doubtful and usually not acceptable. Hope this is helpful. Good luck with your editing. Chiswick Chap (talk) 18:26, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

May 2025

Hello, I'm Chiswick Chap. An edit that you recently made to Last universal common ancestor seemed to be a test and has been reverted. If you want to practice editing, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. SteveQS, could you please stop experimenting on live articles. You can use your sandbox (see the menu at top of the page) for editing practice. Chiswick Chap (talk) 15:17, 13 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making test edits in Wikipedia pages, such as those you made to Khimki, even if you intend to fix them later. Your edits have been reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use your sandbox. Thank you. Iiii I I I (talk) 03:21, 14 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]