User talk:Starlet147
Add topicArchives (Index) |
|
This page is archived by ClueBot III. |
Welcome to my talk page! Couple rules that should be heeded.
- If you are here because I reverted your good faith edit, I am sorry for that, feel free to use the trout button on my USERPAGE.
- If you are here because I reverted your vandalism and you're gonna call me obscenities, Read this essay and then just...Take a step back from the computer and do something else. ANYTHING else. I am DONE with updating the vandalism counter (╯°□°)╯︵ ┻━┻
A barnstar for you!
[edit]| The Userpage Barnstar | ||
How ironic that someone who's not the most creative typehas a user page far more prettier and creative than whatever I feel like splurging onto mine. toby (t)(c)(rw) 20:10, 18 May 2026 (UTC) |
- Not the most creative type as in I don’t have the patience, willpower and time to write an article, which is kinda why I went into counter vandalism Starlet! (Need to talk?) (Library) (Sandbox) 21:35, 18 May 2026 (UTC)
Interest in reward board request to promote Kalpana Chawla to GA status
[edit]Hi! I saw your request at the reward board and was interested in fulfilling it. I understand you'd like to promote Kalpana Chawla to a good article. If this request is still open, if the criteria for completion has changed, or if there's any additional information you'd like me to have, please let me know, and I'll start working on it right away. Thanks! Salmon of Knowledge (talk) 08:34, 3 July 2026 (UTC)
- I don't got any additional changes, but thanks for picking this up! Starlet 15:53, 3 July 2026 (UTC)
- I wish you luck Starlet 20:10, 3 July 2026 (UTC)
- Thanks for confirming, and thanks for your sentiments! I'll start working on this and will give you updates until I finish. If you need anything else from me during that time, feel free to bring it up on either of our talk pages, and I'll try to respond with celerity. Salmon of Knowledge (talk) 23:54, 3 July 2026 (UTC)
- How’s it going? Starlet 01:34, 8 July 2026 (UTC)
- I'm finished with a revised draft of the article and am currently trying to align it with the Manual of Style. Unfortunately, I've been caught up in some personal affairs, so I haven't finished as quickly or updated you as much as I wanted to, but I expect to have the final draft completed by tomorrow, at which point I can share the draft for it to be looked over and nominated. Salmon of Knowledge (talk) 10:41, 8 July 2026 (UTC)
- Nice! I don’t have a set time limit, so you can take your time Starlet 14:28, 8 July 2026 (UTC)
- Hi! I wanted to provide you another update. I'm finished looking over the draft myself and have submitted it as an edit to the mainspace article, which you can see here. If you want to take a look at it yourself, I'd really appreciate any comments or criticism. Because it's a significant revision, I wrote a message on the talk page in case any conflicts arise from one of my changes. If no conflicts or only minor conflicts arise over the course of the next few days, I'll go ahead an nominate it as a good article. Salmon of Knowledge (talk) 09:46, 11 July 2026 (UTC)
- Nice job! Starlet 22:29, 11 July 2026 (UTC)
- Hello! I wanted to provide you an update again. Now that my changes have been live for over a week, I've assumed that a consensus has built that the changes can remain. After consulting with another significant contributor to the article, I've co-nominated it as a good article with them, which you can see on this page. Now, I'm waiting for a reviewer to take it up and decide whether to accept or reject it as such. Salmon of Knowledge (talk) 20:23, 20 July 2026 (UTC)
- Hey! I'm here to provide another update to you. I've just received a message notifying me of the fact that Simongraham had begun reviewing the GAN I submitted for the article when I last updated you. You can visit the review page here to follow it and see how it's going. Usually, GA reviews take about a week to complete, so I'd expect a decision to be made in about that time frame. When one has, I'll provide you another update unless you say otherwise. Thanks! Salmon of Knowledge (talk) 12:42, 30 July 2026 (UTC)
- great job so far Starlet 00:34, 3 August 2026 (UTC)
- Hello! I appreciate your continued patience throughout this process. I wanted to give you this final update. After making a few more changes and discussing with the reviewer, I've been notified that the article has been successfully been classified as a good article. You can see this decision on the review page or by going to the article's talk page and noticing its rating there. Again, I wanted to thank you for your patience during this process, as well as for bringing such an interesting and promising article to my attention with your initial reward board request. It was a pleasure for me to work on this! Salmon of Knowledge (talk) 09:38, 10 August 2026 (UTC)
- I'm finished with a revised draft of the article and am currently trying to align it with the Manual of Style. Unfortunately, I've been caught up in some personal affairs, so I haven't finished as quickly or updated you as much as I wanted to, but I expect to have the final draft completed by tomorrow, at which point I can share the draft for it to be looked over and nominated. Salmon of Knowledge (talk) 10:41, 8 July 2026 (UTC)
- How’s it going? Starlet 01:34, 8 July 2026 (UTC)
- Thanks for confirming, and thanks for your sentiments! I'll start working on this and will give you updates until I finish. If you need anything else from me during that time, feel free to bring it up on either of our talk pages, and I'll try to respond with celerity. Salmon of Knowledge (talk) 23:54, 3 July 2026 (UTC)
- I wish you luck Starlet 20:10, 3 July 2026 (UTC)
| The Good Article Barnstar | ||
| Well, you did it. Congratulations!Starlet 14:40, 13 August 2026 (UTC) |
- Thank you so much! Again, it was truly a pleasure to work on this article; it kept me busy for a little while doing something both fulfilling and exciting. So thanks to sticking around until the end, for introducing this task to me, and of course, for the barnstar! Salmon of Knowledge (talk) 17:28, 14 August 2026 (UTC)
Signature
[edit]
Hello, I'm Femke. I wanted to let you know that your signature does not meet the requirements for signature appearances. As some users have vision problems, signatures are required to have a Body Text to Background contrast of at least 1:4.5. You can use this tool to determine if your signature meets the minimum contrast ratio. If you have any questions, feel free to reply or ask for help at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. In solidarity, —Femke (talk) 🐦 19:58, 1 September 2026 (UTC)
- This better? Starlet 20:27, 1 September 2026 (UTC)
- (talk page watcher) On the checker, both link colors with the background color fail the first two requirements. I would say it is not accessible (and your userpage too, but that's something else). 🫀 Crash // Organhaver ( it / he | talk to me, maybe? ) 04:50, 2 September 2026 (UTC)
- What about now? Starlet 12:41, 2 September 2026 (UTC)
- Hm. You may want to input your colors into another contrast checker that I prefer. I've done it for you (here). That shows the contrast between the text (of an unvisited link) and your background color. You can slide the background color settings until it works, but also maybe you could change the link color? 🫀 Crash // Organhaver ( it / he | talk to me, maybe? ) 16:11, 2 September 2026 (UTC)
- Gave up and changed back to this. Starlet! (Need to talk?) (Library) (Sandbox) 19:39, 5 September 2026 (UTC)
- (talk page watcher) Both Starlet and Starlet (which is different from your original signature) have a contrast greater than 4.5:1 and are compliant with the guidelines and WCAG AA. However, as @Organhaver says, neither are compliant with WCAG AAA, which requires 7:1 contrast, however, that is optional for signatures. If I'm incorrect about any of this, please let me know. BSH🌸 (talk) - (she/her) 21:17, 5 September 2026 (UTC)
- I honestly don’t know why I changed my sig from this into the bubble thing anyways, I’m staying like this now. @BlueStaticHorse you ain’t blue anymore I guess you are pink static horse now. Starlet! (Need to talk?) (Library) (Sandbox) 22:52, 6 September 2026 (UTC)
- Okay. Yeah, I guess I am pinkStaticHorse now. (Although, I changed my signature to blue after I thought of the username, my username was made up by combining some random words after every other username I had thought of was taken) BSH🌸 (talk) - (she/her) 10:59, 7 September 2026 (UTC)
- I honestly don’t know why I changed my sig from this into the bubble thing anyways, I’m staying like this now. @BlueStaticHorse you ain’t blue anymore I guess you are pink static horse now. Starlet! (Need to talk?) (Library) (Sandbox) 22:52, 6 September 2026 (UTC)
- (talk page watcher) Both Starlet and Starlet (which is different from your original signature) have a contrast greater than 4.5:1 and are compliant with the guidelines and WCAG AA. However, as @Organhaver says, neither are compliant with WCAG AAA, which requires 7:1 contrast, however, that is optional for signatures. If I'm incorrect about any of this, please let me know. BSH🌸 (talk) - (she/her) 21:17, 5 September 2026 (UTC)
- Gave up and changed back to this. Starlet! (Need to talk?) (Library) (Sandbox) 19:39, 5 September 2026 (UTC)
- Hm. You may want to input your colors into another contrast checker that I prefer. I've done it for you (here). That shows the contrast between the text (of an unvisited link) and your background color. You can slide the background color settings until it works, but also maybe you could change the link color? 🫀 Crash // Organhaver ( it / he | talk to me, maybe? ) 16:11, 2 September 2026 (UTC)
- What about now? Starlet 12:41, 2 September 2026 (UTC)
- (talk page watcher) On the checker, both link colors with the background color fail the first two requirements. I would say it is not accessible (and your userpage too, but that's something else). 🫀 Crash // Organhaver ( it / he | talk to me, maybe? ) 04:50, 2 September 2026 (UTC)
UBX moves
[edit]If anyone is wondering why I am redirecting my Userboxen to UBX, I'm just trying to clear up the amount of subpages I have. I'd get an admin to delete the redirects and stop adding rediretcs, but that would mess with archive 52 of the new Userboxen page.~2026-48219-13 (talk)(Starlet logged out because I logged out to try to get the add topic button to come back, to no avail.) 19:19, 5 September 2026 (UTC)
- I'm logging back in shortly, lolz. ~2026-48219-13 (talk) 19:22, 5 September 2026 (UTC)
- Starlet here, yes that TA was me, lolz. Tell me If what I'm doing(with the userboxes) is wrong. Starlet 19:25, 5 September 2026 (UTC)
- (talk page watcher) You can delete the existing redirects as G7 or U1, and the move log (which shows along with the deletion log on deleted pages) will show the current placement of the userboxes (assumedly). 🫀 Crash // Organhaver ( it / he | talk to me, maybe? ) 21:08, 5 September 2026 (UTC)
- But wouldn’t that screw up anyone’s user pages that use my boxen? Starlet! (Need to talk?) (Library) (Sandbox) 22:53, 6 September 2026 (UTC)
- Not necessarily. You can go into the "What links here" and change the name of the userboxes in source editor on the pages. It's not too difficult if you have the time for it (and not many transclusions). 🫀 Crash // Organhaver ( it / he | talk to me, maybe? ) 01:53, 7 September 2026 (UTC)
- Sorry to necropost, but I deleted all of the redirects to USERBOXEN that weren't on someone's (That isn't me's) page.
- oh goodness the USERBOXEN curse still persists St☆rlet! (Need to talk?) (Library) (Sandbox) 16:27, 12 October 2026 (UTC)
- Alrighty. No worries. ⚙ Crash >> Organhaver ( it / he | talk to me, maybe? ) 16:57, 12 October 2026 (UTC)
- Not necessarily. You can go into the "What links here" and change the name of the userboxes in source editor on the pages. It's not too difficult if you have the time for it (and not many transclusions). 🫀 Crash // Organhaver ( it / he | talk to me, maybe? ) 01:53, 7 September 2026 (UTC)
- But wouldn’t that screw up anyone’s user pages that use my boxen? Starlet! (Need to talk?) (Library) (Sandbox) 22:53, 6 September 2026 (UTC)
Trouted
[edit]
Whack!
You've been whacked with a wet trout.
Don't take this too seriously. Someone just wants to let you know that you did something silly.You have been trouted for: Whole sig fiasco Starlet! (Need to talk?) (Library) (Sandbox) 19:45, 5 September 2026 (UTC)
Trouted
[edit]Whack!
You've been whacked with a wet trout.
Don't take this too seriously. Someone just wants to let you know that you did something silly.You have been trouted for: This edit - I wasn't going to do this, but you said to... BSH🌸 (talk) - (she/her) 18:09, 17 September 2026 (UTC)
hello
[edit]miss starlet I'm sorry for vandalism i deeply apologise. my exams are coming and I feel very weird and distracted and so I have done this action. I think ur a girl even I am pls I'm sryy ~2026-52067-90 (talk) 15:01, 28 September 2026 (UTC)
CVUA training
[edit]| Your CVUA training pages have been blanked as the training is now finished, as to not give away the answers to other students. If you need to reference the training, your edits are preserved in the edit history. I will continue to monitor your contributions after the conclusion of the training, as I do with all of my students. |
BSH🌸 (talk) - (she/her) 15:08, 28 September 2026 (UTC)
hi
[edit]can you please make me a userbox I read your profile and you said you will ~2026-52067-90 (talk) 15:22, 28 September 2026 (UTC)
For future information, there is a user warning for refactoring other's talk page comments. You can use it by placing {{subst:uw-tpv}} on the user's talk page. Happy editing! BSH🌸 (talk) - (she/her) 16:05, 28 September 2026 (UTC)
A barnstar for you!
[edit]| The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar | |
| Thanks for your counter-vandalism work. BSH🌸 (talk) - (she/her) 14:50, 2 October 2026 (UTC) |
- Thanks! St☆rlet! (Need to talk?) (Library) (Sandbox) 14:51, 2 October 2026 (UTC)
A cookie for you!
[edit]| You keep beating me to reverting vandalism, well done! BlueStaticHorse (talk🌸) 15:05, 8 October 2026 (UTC) |
Happy First Edit Day!
[edit]| Happy First Edit Day! Hi Starlet147! On behalf of the Birthday Committee, I'd like to wish you a very happy anniversary of the day you made your first edit and became a Wikipedian! DaniloDaysOfOurLives (talk) 04:46, 10 October 2026 (UTC) |
Happy First Edit Day!
[edit]
- I just noticed my 1st edit could very much seem like a test edit if it was in mainspace St☆rlet! (Need to talk?) (Library) (Sandbox) 18:07, 10 October 2026 (UTC)
Happy First Edit Day!
[edit]

Have a very happy first edit anniversary!
From the Birthday Committee, Rencoolguy (talk) 17:02, 10 October 2026 (UTC)
- It's my 1st edit day? Time flies so fast :) St☆rlet! (Need to talk?) (Library) (Sandbox) 17:54, 10 October 2026 (UTC)
Trouted
[edit]Whack!
You've been whacked with a wet trout.
Don't take this too seriously. Someone just wants to let you know that you did something silly.You have been trouted for:Wikibirthday Slap!!! St☆rlet! (Need to talk?) (Library) (Sandbox) 18:09, 10 October 2026 (UTC)
Happy First Edit Day!
[edit]| Hey, Starlet147. I'd like to wish you a wonderful First Edit Day on behalf of the Wikipedia Birthday Committee! Have a great day! ☘︎☘︎☘︎ALEXHammeke (talk | guestbook | sandbox) 19:37, 10 October 2026 (UTC) |
☘︎☘︎☘︎ALEXHammeke (talk | guestbook | sandbox) 19:37, 10 October 2026 (UTC)
Userbox request
[edit]This user watches Comet.
This user watches Charge!
This user watches Roar.
This user watches The Nest.
This user watches the Tennis Channel.
Catfurball (talk) 21:58, 15 October 2026 (UTC)
- St☆rlet! (Need to talk?) (Library) (Sandbox) 14:33, 16 October 2026 (UTC)

This user watches Comet - St☆rlet! (Need to talk?) (Library) (Sandbox) 14:38, 16 October 2026 (UTC)

This user watches Charge! - St☆rlet! (Need to talk?) (Library) (Sandbox) 14:41, 16 October 2026 (UTC)

This user watches Roar. - St☆rlet! (Need to talk?) (Library) (Sandbox) 14:45, 16 October 2026 (UTC)

This user watches The Nest. - This one was a pain St☆rlet! (Need to talk?) (Library) (Sandbox) 14:51, 16 October 2026 (UTC)

This user watches Tennis Channel.
This user watches Ion Mystery.
This user watches Ion Plus.
This user watches Bounce TV.
This user watches Court TV.
This user watches Grit.
This user watches Laff.
This user watches Defy.
This user watches A&E
This user watches Lifetime.
This user watches Game Show Network.
This user watches Great Entertainment Television.
This user watches Sony Movie Channel.