Hello, Spaully. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
I may be going to Tokyo sometime this summer. Do you know if this is safe to do so? I've heard various conflicting reports on this from various articles. Gooballsam (talk) 15:19, 21 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
@Gooballsam:Lucky you! I have no special knowledge in this area but I tend to look first at the UK Foreign Office advice - Japan is generally very safe. You cannot travel close to Fukushima for obvious reasons (though thanks for the radiation context from VQuakr). Take a look at your government advice, if there is some, and go from there. If I were able to I would certainly feel safe travelling there! |→ Spaully~talk~16:29, 21 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Please do not delete article Baltic Estonia! This is a completely new approach, it points out that Estonia shares a lot more with Latvia than with Finland. One may delete Lithuania but Estonia and Latvia are in many aspects one unit. This article is a common project of Estonian and Latvian wikipedia authors, Latvian ammendments to the article will appear soon with focusing culture, cuisine and folk costumes. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Maalane (talk • contribs) 17:51, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
It takes some time for new pages to appear on Google for a variety of reasons - the main one we cannot change which is that it takes time for Google spiders to trawl new pages. New articles will also only appear once approved. Would you say the article is now what you intend it to be? Then I or another editor can read through and offer advice. |→ Spaully~talk~08:44, 2 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Hi. We're into the last five days of the Women in Red World Contest. There's a new bonus prize of $200 worth of books of your choice to win for creating the most new women biographies between 0:00 on the 26th and 23:59 on 30th November. If you've been contributing to the contest, thank you for your support, we've produced over 2000 articles. If you haven't contributed yet, we would appreciate you taking the time to add entries to our articles achievements list by the end of the month. Thank you, and if participating, good luck with the finale!
Hello, Spaully. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
Greetings! I have been combing through stale userspace drafts recently, and happened upon one of yours: User:Spaully/Test2. As you do not appear to be currently using it, I was wondering if you'd be willing to either blank it or request it be deleted by tagging it with {{db-u1}}. Thanks! —Compassionate727(T·C)20:32, 27 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Nematocyst-discharged.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination.
ATTENTION: This is an automated, bot-generated message. This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 23:55, 21 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Nematocyst-discharged.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination.
ATTENTION: This is an automated, bot-generated message. This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 23:55, 29 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Nematocyst-discharged.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination.
Hi this is to inform you that West African Ebola virus epidemic which you edited will be submitted for WikiJournal of Medicine...The objective of this message is to invite the contributors to collaboratively submit the article for review through Wiki.J.Med, and if possible, to help in further betterment of the article in accordance to the suggestions of the reviewers. Wikipedia articles are collaboratively authored. So, it is very important to make the authors aware of such a process that the article is currently undergoing[3] thanks--Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 13:17, 3 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, Spaully. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
Are you really telling those who are engaged in discussion that they shouldn't apply the clear consensus of the discussion because some people who don't even have the courtesy to present their thinking it edit notes, yet alone in the discussion, have been obstructive? That is the absolute negation of the essential principles of Wiki. Kevin McE (talk) 21:47, 14 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The Wikimedia Foundation is asking for your feedback in a survey about your experience with Wikipedia and Wikimedia. The purpose of this survey is to learn how well the Foundation is supporting your work on wiki and how we can change or improve things in the future. The opinions you share will directly affect the current and future work of the Wikimedia Foundation.
A couple of weeks ago, we invited you to take the Community Insights Survey. It is the Wikimedia Foundation’s annual survey of our global communities. We want to learn how well we support your work on wiki. We are 10% towards our goal for participation. If you have not already taken the survey, you can help us reach our goal! Your voice matters to us.
There are only a few weeks left to take the Community Insights Survey! We are 30% towards our goal for participation. If you have not already taken the survey, you can help us reach our goal!
With this poll, the Wikimedia Foundation gathers feedback on how well we support your work on wiki. It only takes 15-25 minutes to complete, and it has a direct impact on the support we provide.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
I'm really following the history of Beckenham and connections to Bruyn and Marney.
The History of Parliament entry for Robert de Marney indicates the Alice le Lacer/de Marney marriage to be about 1365, so 1345 looks like a typo.
Robert de Marney doesn't get 'good press' in the history of Parliament being a tad avaricious to say the least.
The sources are really life of William Bruyn (d1361) and the Robert de Marney entry on hist of parliament.
But in the interests of accuracy i wanted to flag it up. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Novafact (talk • contribs) 15:39, 25 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you, that is a useful tip. I've used Inkscape a bit before but have not used software that natively produces .svg graphs. I've updated that graph and will use it from now on. |→ Spaully~talk~08:17, 1 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for the link. I will be updating the original graph today but you are right there are many other good graphs that could be made from this data. |→ Spaully~talk~05:05, 6 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Looking to talk to an editor who works on controversial, bipartisan pages
Hi, my name is zaid jilani and I'm a reporter working on an article about wikipedia. The article is based on a study showing that wikipedia promotes cooperation between diverse groups of people. I'd love to talk to an editor who has worked on edits on a contentious or controversial page. I saw that you've done edits on the abortion page and others, would you be willing to talk about your experience and how you manage disagreements?
Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
Hi. Regarding your edit here. Uses of Age module templates do not update every day (despite WP:AGECALC saying they do). It can easily be a week or even longer between updates. In order to experiment I put the same 'date last updated' footnote on a couple of other similar articles. For example, in the article First Minister of Wales, right now the term of office (in the table) for the incumbent Drakeford is given as '2 years, 4 days', even though the time between his appointment (13 Dec 18) and today (30 Dec 20) is actually 2 years, 17 days. That article has currently gone 13 days since the Age template was updated. Happy to discuss why this happens if you're interested! Therefore an incumbent's tenure length quickly becomes out of date, so I think the warning footnote is important, so I have reverted your edit. Thanks. Mmitchell10 (talk) 11:18, 30 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
It is valuable content which I contributed. Please tell me why you make it spam link. l know you are king of Wikipedia like lion in forest and right to do what you want. But it is very true together, we can do big. Thanks 124.253.144.126 (talk) 23:22, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
I am Piotr Konieczny, a sociologist of new media at Hanyang University (and User:Piotrus on Wikipedia). I would like to better understand Wikipedia's volunteers who edit medical topics, many associated with the WikiProject Medicine, and known to create some of the highest quality content on Wikipedia. I hope that the lessons I can learn from you that I will present to the academic audience will benefit both the WikiProject Medicine (improving your understanding of yourself and helping to promote it and attract new volunteers) and the wider world of medical volunteering and academia. Open access copy of the resulting research will be made available at WikiProject's Medicine upon the completion of the project.
All questions are optional. The survey is divided into 4 parts: 1 - Brief description of yourself; 2 - Questions about your volunteering; 3 - Questions about WikiProject Medicine and 4 - Questions about Wikipedia's coverage of medical topics.
Please note that by filling out this questionnaire, you consent to participate in this research. The survey is anonymous and all personal details relevant to your experience will be kept private and will not be transferred to any third party.
I appreciate your support of this research and thank you in advance for taking the time to participate and share your experiences! If you have any questions at all, please feel free to contact me at my Wikipedia user page or through my email listed on the survey page (or by Wikipedia email this user function).
