Jump to content

User talk:Servicepk

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

May 2025

[edit]

Information icon Hello! I'm Denisarona. I just wanted to let you know that your recent edit(s) to the page League of Nations have been reverted because they appear to have added incorrect information. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite a reliable source, discuss it on the article's talk page, or leave me a message on my talk page. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Thank you. Denisarona (talk) 15:28, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to United Nations. Your edits do not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use your sandbox. Thank you. Denisarona (talk) 15:29, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Warning icon Please stop. If you continue to use disruptive, inappropriate or hard-to-read formatting, you may be blocked from editing. There is a Wikipedia Manual of Style, and edits should not deliberately go against it without special reason. Remsense ‥  12:29, 14 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Stop icon You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you make disruptive edits to Wikipedia contrary to the Manual of Style, as you did at Motion Picture Editors Guild. Remsense ‥  12:30, 14 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

okay Sir....I am new and try to learn and contribute....I will careful next time ...Thank you for guidance. Servicepk (talk) 12:33, 14 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Stop icon You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you make disruptive edits to Wikipedia contrary to the Manual of Style. Please don't add links that already appear in the article to the "See also" section, please see MOS:NOTSEEAGAIN. Thank you. Annh07 (talk) 16:05, 16 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Stop icon This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Islamabad, you may be blocked from editing without further notice.
You have previously been asked to STOP adding "See also" links to pages that are already linked in the article, but are continuing to do so. Please STOP before you are blocked - Arjayay (talk) 13:04, 20 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Stop icon with clock
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.
If you believe that there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 13:33, 20 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

Muhammad Omer Chaudhry
added a link pointing to Controller
University of Narowal
added a link pointing to Punjab Assembly

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 20:01, 20 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Muhammad Omer Chaudhry, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Controller.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 19:58, 27 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Lahore Garrison Shooting Gallery, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Fram (talk) 13:23, 3 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

June 2025

[edit]
Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.
ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 13:48, 3 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]