User talk:Sebco7

Welcome!

Hello, Sebco7, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as James lefley, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines for page creation, and may soon be deleted.

You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles. See the Article Wizard. Thank you.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Schuhpuppe (talk) 09:39, 5 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of James lefley

Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages, such as James lefley, to Wikipedia. Doing so is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Schuhpuppe (talk) 09:39, 5 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

July 2010

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Schuhpuppe (talk) 09:40, 5 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

September 2010

Welcome to Wikipedia. While everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your contributions, such as your recent edit to Official Monster Raving Loony Party, did not appear to be constructive and was automatically reverted by DASHBot.

Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
DASHBot produces few false positives, but they do happen. If you believe the bot has reverted your edit wrongly, it is helpful if you report the error so the bot does not make the same mistake again. Please:

Click here to automatically generate a false positive report.
Edit this page and remove this message.

Thanks, DASHBot Anti-Vandalism (talk) 10:20, 15 September 2010 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to the page Official Monster Raving Loony Party. Such edits constitute vandalism and are reverted. Please do not continue to make unconstructive edits to pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you. Anna Lincoln 10:21, 15 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to Fox. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. Anna Lincoln 10:24, 15 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

October 2010

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Politics, you may be blocked from editing. --石猴 (Shí Hóu) (talk) 13:45, 4 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This is the final warning you will receive regarding your disruptive edits.

The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Mohandas Karamchand Gandhi, you will be blocked from editing without further notice. --石猴 (Shí Hóu) (talk) 08:02, 6 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Faith Cook for deletion

A discussion has begun about whether the article Faith Cook, which you created or to which you contributed, should be deleted. While contributions are welcome, an article may be deleted if it is inconsistent with Wikipedia policies and guidelines for inclusion, explained in the deletion policy.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Faith Cook until a consensus is reached, and you are welcome to contribute to the discussion.

You may edit the article during the discussion, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Gigs (talk) 19:34, 12 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

March 2011

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Bacon, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted (undone) by ClueBot NG.

Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
ClueBot NG produces very few false positives, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been detected as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Bacon was changed by Sebco7 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.954058 on 2011-03-04T09:31:49+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 09:31, 4 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Bruce Lee. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted.

If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
ClueBot NG produces very few false positives, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been detected as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Bruce Lee was changed by Sebco7 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.924443 on 2011-03-04T09:39:32+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 09:39, 4 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

Materialscientist (talk) 09:44, 4 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

April 2011

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Bacon, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Please stop your incessant vandalism. —Rsteilberg ^talk 20:30, 17 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]