User talk:Satyajeet86

Welcome!

Hello, Lookhereindia, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Girlfriend Khali Hai Kya, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! DGG ( talk ) 23:02, 30 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Girlfriend Khali Hai Kya

The article Girlfriend Khali Hai Kya has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No third party evidence of notability

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. DGG ( talk ) 23:02, 30 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Ho Halla

Hello, Lookhereindia. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, Ho Halla, for deletion because I don't think it meets our criteria for inclusion. If you don't want the article deleted:

edit the page
remove the text that looks like this: {{proposed deletion/dated...}}
save the page

Also, be sure to explain why you think the article should be kept in your edit summary or on the article's talk page. If you don't do so, it may be deleted later anyway.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.

Domdeparis (talk) 05:08, 19 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Payal Dev

Hello, Lookhereindia. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, Payal Dev, for deletion because I don't think it meets our criteria for inclusion. If you don't want the article deleted:

edit the page
remove the text that looks like this: {{proposed deletion/dated...}}
save the page

Also, be sure to explain why you think the article should be kept in your edit summary or on the article's talk page. If you don't do so, it may be deleted later anyway.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.

Domdeparis (talk) 05:40, 19 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Hribom for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Hribom is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hribom until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Celestina007 (talk) 19:51, 3 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Sahil Mishra

The article Sahil Mishra has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Does not appear to meet WP:NACTOR

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Singularity42 (talk) 18:04, 5 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Devrishi (April 6)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Taabii was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Devrishi and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Taabii (talk) 17:35, 6 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I’ve added 3 new reliable sources including national media, and cleaned the tone as per past suggestions. Kindly review. Lookhereindia (talk) 23:57, 11 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Lookhereindia! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Taabii (talk) 17:35, 6 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

== Reply to reviewer ==

Thank you @Taabii for reviewing the draft.

I appreciate your time and feedback. I understand the concerns regarding the notability and the importance of using reliable, independent sources. I am currently working on gathering more substantial references that meet Wikipedia's standards.

I have also added a disclosure regarding my association with the subject as per the COI guidelines. I will reach out to the AfC Help Desk or the Teahouse if I need further help in improving the draft.

Warm regards,

Lookhereindia (representing Devrishi) Lookhereindia (talk) 18:10, 6 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I’ve added 3 new reliable sources including national media, and cleaned the tone as per past suggestions. Kindly review. Lookhereindia (talk) 10:13, 12 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Promotional sources

You have used sources that are either clearly noted as paid placement, unmarked press releases or marketing content, or blatant fake content farms which house unmarked SEO placement. One of Wikipedia's core policies is that contributions must be verifiable through reliable sources, preferably using inline citations. These sources step far beyond those policies. Please carefully evaluate your references in the future, and ensure that you are in compliance with our mandatory paid editing disclosures. Sam Kuru (talk) 17:52, 6 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I am associated with the subject of this article (Devrishi), and I am editing this draft to improve its neutrality and verifiability using independent, reliable sources. Lookhereindia (talk) 18:08, 6 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

foxstoryindia.com: Linksearch en - meta - de - fr - simple - wikt:en - wikt:fr • MER-C Cross-wiki • Reports: Links on en - COIBot - COIBot-Local • Discussions: tracked - advanced • COIBot-Local - COIBot-XWiki - Wikipedia: en - fr - de • Google: search • meta • Domain: domaintools • AboutUs.org • Live link: http://spam.foxstoryindia.com

Your submission at Articles for creation: Devrishi (June 5)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by WikiMentor01 was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Devrishi and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

WikiMentor01 (talk) 04:46, 5 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Devrishi (June 10)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by MCE89 was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Devrishi and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

MCE89 (talk) 11:07, 10 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

June 2025

Welcome to Wikipedia. Your account has been blocked from editing because your username gives the impression that the account represents a group, team, club, organization, company, product, department, or website. Your username is the principal reason for the block. You are welcome to continue editing after you have chosen a new username that complies with Wikipedia's username policy.

You should also read our conflict of interest guideline and be aware that promotional editing is not acceptable, regardless of the username that you choose. Additionally, if your contributions to Wikipedia form all or part of work for which you are, or expect to be, paid or compensated in any way, you must disclose who is paying you to edit here. You may also read our FAQ for article subjects.

Please take a moment to either create a new account, or request a username change to this account.

To create a new account with a different username, simply log out of this account and then click here to make a new one.
If you prefer to change the username of this account, you may do so by adding the following text to the bottom of your user talk page (this page): {{unblock-un|new username|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Important items to note:

The new username that you choose must represent you as an individual person, and it must comply with Wikipedia's username policy.
- You are permitted to use a username that contains the name of a company or organization if it also identifies you individually. Examples include: "Sara Smith at XYZ Company", "Mark at WidgetsUSA", or "FoobarFan87", but not "SEO Manager at XYZ Company".
The new username you choose cannot already be taken and used by another account. You can search here to see if the username you'd like to choose is available. If the search returns, "There is no global account for [username]", that means it is available.

Appeals: If your username does not represent a group, organization, department, website, or other entity described above, and if you believe that this block was incorrect or made in error, you may appeal this block by adding the following text to the bottom of your user talk page (this page): {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Thank you. 331dot (talk) 13:30, 10 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Changing your username is sufficient to remove the block, but please read WP:COI and WP:PAID. 331dot (talk) 13:31, 10 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You still have not adequately responded or taken action to the inquiry regarding your appearance as an undisclosed paid editor. If you make any additional edits without complying, you may be blocked from editing. 331dot (talk) 16:29, 22 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Sanatan Wisdom Foundation for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Sanatan Wisdom Foundation is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sanatan Wisdom Foundation until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Fram (talk) 13:32, 10 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Rajesh Dandotiya moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Rajesh Dandotiya. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Dclemens1971 (talk) 13:55, 10 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Devrishi (June 14)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by CSMention269 was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Devrishi and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

☮️Counter-Strike:Mention 269🕉️^{(😐 ● 🗨️ ● ✉️ ● 📔)} 04:46, 14 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This user's request to be unblocked to request a change in username has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

Satyajeet86 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Requested username:

Satyajeet86 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Request reason:

I apologize for my previous username, which mistakenly looked like an organization's name. I am an individual editor, not a group. Please change my username to "Satyajeet86" and unblock me so I can resume editing. Thank you. Lookhereindia (talk) 10:06, 21 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Accept reason:

I have renamed you. Before you edit, please read and comply with WP:PAID, and also read WP:COI. 331dot (talk) 10:28, 21 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please also place new posts at the bottom, so they stay in order. This may be easier to do if you click "edit" and not "reply" to edit this page, the reply function is imperfect and doesn't work well in every situation. 331dot (talk) 10:29, 21 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@331dot doesn't look like this person is going to comply. S0091 (talk) 16:26, 22 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Devrishi (June 22)

Your recent article submission has been rejected and cannot be resubmitted. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by S0091 was: This submission is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was: WP:PAID promo. S0091 (talk) 16:24, 22 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

S0091 (talk) 16:24, 22 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

COIs

To document the discussion at the AfC help desk which led to your COI declaration regarding Devrishi, please confirm here you have read WP:COI and WP:PAID and will follow those policies and guidelines going forward. If it is ever unclear whether you have a COI or meet the WP:PAID, you can ask at the Teahouse. S0091 (talk) 20:21, 22 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I confirm that I have read and understand Wikipedia's guidelines on WP:COI and WP:PAID and will follow those policies and guidelines going forward. Satyajeet86 (talk) 20:31, 22 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Acknowledging your response. As stated before, if you ever have questions or need clarification, you can ask at the Teahouse. S0091 (talk) 20:52, 22 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]