Jump to content

User talk:Sarah777

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


What the critics said -
"She's had years to adapt. She hasn't. It's time for her to be gone. Rklawton (talk) 19:36, 24 May 2011 (UTC)"[reply]
"I have thought long and hard to re-create what went through my mind at the time" - American Liar (2013)
Icon This user has been on Wikipedia for 19 years, 3 months and 19 days.




Hi folks....I'm back now! wassup?!!(Sarah777 15:40, 8 August 2007 (UTC))[reply]
They're threatening to ban you for an entire bloody year at Arbcom. Absolutely f**k*** outrageous!
Show them your article creation list, Sarah, I think you probably have the record.
Sure you lose your rag from time to time - but don't we all, especially when faced with extreme provocation and wind-up merchnats....Gaimhreadhan (kiwiexile at DMOZ) talk17:46, 8 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]


Template:WikiProject Ireland

Ireland Wiki State of Play - Aug 16 2007

[edit]
Ireland
articles
Importance
Top High Mid Low None Total
Quality
FA 4 4
A
GA 5 5
B 5 2 7 3 39 56
Start 2 3 25 122 237 389
Stub 8 160 317 485
Assessed 7 5 40 285 602 939
Unassessed 0 0 0 1 286 287
Total 7 5 40 286 888 1226

Category:Ireland articles by quality

Latest version

[edit]

here

Assessment Log

Why

[edit]

Our article on Kabbalah says "Names of God in Judaism have further prominence, though infinite meaning turns the whole Torah into a Divine name." I noticed I was approaching a milestone, I used to worry about numeric meanings of the Kabbalah, I took a screenshot and headed here. There are so many rabbit warrens with so many tantalizing holes, Qaballa, letter symbolism, OMG the grimoires! Anyway, you can zap this 7,777th edit by Sswonk, it is meaningless which most things ultimately are. Sswonk (talk) 15:51, 22 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Tis indeed a puzzle why consciousness, whatever it is, seems to crave "meaning" ! Sarah777 (talk) 21:51, 22 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia Indeed

[edit]

I have long (going back 20 years) known that on matters geopolitical, Wikipedia was censored and biased towards an Anglo-American/Western perspective. I assumed at the time there was an army of bored US soldiers in Iraq or wherever spending their time "improving the project". Obviously, they had the time available to move up the Wiki-ranks, become Admins etc.

Now I see it was rather more coordinated than that. Wikipedia has become (and maybe always was) an instrument of Anglo-American hegemonistic propaganda manipulated by the CIA. What do you think Sswonk? Sarah777 (talk) 19:53, 10 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]