User talk:Samtheplatypus

April 2011

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Radiation therapy. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. --SoCalSuperEagle (talk) 20:42, 28 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Radiation therapy with this edit, you may be blocked from editing. Mato (talk) 20:47, 28 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

October 2011

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Pink Flamingos, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted (undone) by ClueBot NG.

Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
ClueBot NG produces very few false positives, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been detected as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Pink Flamingos was changed by Samtheplatypus (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.893179 on 2011-10-31T17:06:22+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 17:06, 31 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Pangolin with this edit. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Geoff ^{Who, me?} 17:12, 31 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Jared with this edit, you may be blocked from editing. Geoff ^{Who, me?} 17:15, 31 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Jared, you will be blocked from editing without further notice.
Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: Jared was changed by Samtheplatypus (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.902574 on 2011-10-31T17:18:30+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 17:18, 31 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation

I noticed your submission in Articles for creation, Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Jared Berkompas. Thanks! It will be reviewed by a volunteer soon.

Before it can be added to Wikipedia, your submission should have references. All articles on Wikipedia should have inline, numbered references after facts, showing the 'reliable source' (a newspaper, book, etc.) where the information can be checked, so that all information is verifiable.

Here's a video tutorial - hit play, then right-click for "full screen".

Here's an example of how to add references:

Chzz is 98 years old.<ref> "The book of Chzz", Aardvark Books, 2009. </ref>

He likes tea.<ref> Smith, John. "[http://foonews.com/Article42 Interview with Chzz]", Foo News, 1 April 2010. Retrieved 2011-05-22. </ref>

== References ==

That makes the references automatically display as small numbers^[1] which will link to the details in the section titled == References == at the end. You can see that example in action here.

Please add references to your submission, which will be reviewed as soon as possible. See also, Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners. If you need any help, just put {{helpme}} at the end of this page, followed by a question or get into our live help chat chanel at #wikipedia-en-help ^connect.

Best, ChzzBot IV (talk) 17:38, 31 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Jared Berkompas

Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages, such as Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Jared Berkompas, to Wikipedia. Doing so is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Slon02 (talk) 22:58, 31 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]