User talk:Samp10l

Welcome!

Hello, Samp10l, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Below are some pages you might find helpful. For a user-friendly interactive help forum, see the Wikipedia Teahouse.

Introduction
The five pillars of Wikipedia
How to edit a page
How to write a great article
Simplified Manual of Style
Your first article
Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community
Feel free to make test edits in the sandbox
and check out the Task Center, for ideas about what to work on.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to ask me on my talk page or place {{Help me}} on this page and someone will drop by to help. Again, welcome! Randykitty (talk) 08:53, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

What was the point of this edit?

What did you intend by this edit?

Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I noticed that one or more recent edits you made did not have an edit summary. Collaboration among editors is fundamental to Wikipedia, and every edit should be explained by a clear edit summary, or by discussion on the talk page. Please use the edit summary field to explain your reasoning for an edit and/or to describe what it changes. Summaries save time for other editors and reduce the chances that your edit will be misunderstood. For some edits, an adequate summary may be quite brief.

The edit summary field looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

or in the visual editor:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

Describe what you changed

Please provide an edit summary for every edit you make. When logged in to your Wikipedia account, you can give yourself a reminder by setting Preferences → Editing → Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary (or the default undo summary), and then click the "Save" button. Thanks! 𝕁𝕄𝔽 (talk) 22:23, 14 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Currently, the text mentions the Taula de Ariza and cites a Guardian article as the source. In fact, the Guardian article does not mention it, but the source I changed it to does.

My summary was brief, but I thought it would be obvious to anyone checking the relevant citations. Samp10l (talk) 22:17, 18 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Edit summaries are a politeness to your fellow editors, briefly explaining why you made the change you did, so they don't need to check the relevant citations. Fixed reference tells us what you did but not why you did it. Switching citations without explanation rings alarm bells. 𝕁𝕄𝔽 (talk) 22:55, 18 October 2025 (UTC) Edited to insert a clarification. --𝕁𝕄𝔽 (talk) 22:59, 18 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Is this better?

replaced irrelevant citation with a correct one

Samp10l (talk) 23:25, 18 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, that was all it needed. Thank you. 𝕁𝕄𝔽 (talk) 23:45, 18 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]