User talk:SDKOL123456

Welcome!

Hello, SDKOL123456, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your recent edits to the page Koushani Mukherjee did not conform to Wikipedia's verifiability policy, and may have been removed. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations verified in reliable, reputable print or online sources or in other reliable media. Always provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles.

If you are stuck and looking for help, please see the guide for citing sources or come to The Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Again, welcome! Ravensfire (talk) 22:27, 8 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

February 2025

Hello, I'm Ravensfire. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Koushani Mukherjee, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Ravensfire (talk) 22:27, 8 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Sipra Bose, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Ravensfire (talk) 21:46, 15 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Jadunath Bhattacharya, you may be blocked from editing. Ravensfire (talk) 05:30, 24 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 23

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Durgadas Bannerjee, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Kalikapur. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 19:57, 23 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Sunirmal Basu

Hello, SDKOL123456,

Thank you for creating Sunirmal Basu.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

Please address the tagged issues. Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Kudpung}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 12:54, 7 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Umaprasad Mukhopadhyay moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Umaprasad Mukhopadhyay. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit for review" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Padgriffin ^{Griffin's Nest} 18:12, 7 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Charu Chandra Bandyopadhyay

Hello, SDKOL123456,

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username RedactedHumanoid, and I thank you for your contributions.

I wanted to let you know, however, that I have tagged Charu Chandra Bandyopadhyay for deletion, because it doesn't appear to contain any encyclopedic content. You may find our guide for writing quality articles to be extremely informative. Also, you may want to consider working on future articles in draft space first, where they cannot be deleted for lacking content.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top. If the page is already deleted by the time you come across this message and you wish to retrieve the deleted material, please contact the deleting administrator.

For any further query, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|RedactedHumanoid}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

RedactedHumanoid (talk) 20:10, 7 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Prabodh Chandra Sen

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Prabodh Chandra Sen requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://en.banglapedia.org/index.php/Sen,_Probodhchandra. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Dam222 🌋 (talk) 22:22, 7 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia and copyright

Hello SDKOL123456! While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, it's important to understand and adhere to guidelines about using information from sources to prevent copyright and plagiarism issues. Here are the key points:

Limited quotation: You may only copy or translate a small portion of a source. Any direct quotations must be enclosed in double quotation marks (") and properly cited using an inline citation. More information is available on the non-free content page. To learn how to cite a source, see Help:Referencing for beginners.
Paraphrasing: Beyond limited quotations, you are required to put all information in your own words. Following the source's wording too closely can lead to copyright issues and is not permitted; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. Even when paraphrasing, you must still cite your sources as appropriate.
Image use guidelines: In most scenarios, only freely licensed or public domain images may be used and these should be uploaded to our sister project, Wikimedia Commons. In some scenarios, non-freely copyrighted content can be used if they meet all ten of our non-free content criteria; Wikipedia:Plain and simple non-free content guide may help with determining a file's eligibility.
Copyrighted material donation: If you hold the copyright to the content you want to copy, or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license the text for publication here. Please see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
Copying and translation within Wikipedia: Wikipedia articles can be copied or translated, however they must have proper attribution in accordance with Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. For translation, see Help:Translation § Licensing.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices. Persistent failure to comply may result in being blocked from editing. If you have any questions or need further clarification, please ask them here on this page, or leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Whpq (talk) 22:36, 7 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Sushil Jana moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Sushil Jana. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability and you may have a possible Conflict of Interest. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit for review" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Jeraxmoira🐉 (talk) 13:03, 8 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Agree on this move. The first draft appears to be from a student and unlikely to be a thesis for a doctorate level degree. I'm not sure about the second source, but it's a bit questionable as well. Ravensfire (talk) 02:06, 9 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Ajit Krishna Basu moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Ajit Krishna Basu. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit for review" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Procyon117 (talk) 13:16, 10 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Nalini Bera moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Nalini Bera. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has no sources. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit for review" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Ravensfire (talk) 17:20, 10 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You added an article about a living person with no sources. Please don't do that. Start it as a draft, add the sources and wait for it to be accepted. Unsourced articles about a living person can be deleted. Ravensfire (talk) 17:33, 10 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sushil Jana (March 10)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Qcne was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please see the referencing tutorial at WP:INTREFVE.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Sushil Jana and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

qcne (talk) 17:29, 10 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, SDKOL123456! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! qcne (talk) 17:29, 10 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Jhareswar Chattopadhyay moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Jhareswar Chattopadhyay. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit for review" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. GrabUp - Talk 07:26, 11 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Kshitindra Narayan Bhattacharya moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Kshitindra Narayan Bhattacharya. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit for review" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Hey man im josh (talk) 15:20, 11 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Charu Chandra Bandyopadhyay for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Charu Chandra Bandyopadhyay is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Charu Chandra Bandyopadhyay until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Rahmatula786 (talk) 05:47, 12 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Article deletion

Please improve Draft:Sushil Jana as opposed to attempting to create an article directly in article space. I've deleted the single line WP:BLP you created as there was no credible claim of significance provided.-- Ponyo^{bons mots} 21:21, 13 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked for three months from editing article space for the persistent creation of extremely poorly-sourced biographies. Please continue to improve the drafts noted on this page in order to demonstrate you have a basic grasp on Wikipedia's sourcing requirements. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Ponyo^{bons mots} 21:27, 13 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Prabodh Chandra Sen moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Prabodh Chandra Sen. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit for review" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Ponyo^{bons mots} 21:22, 13 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Probodh Kumar Sanyal moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Probodh Kumar Sanyal, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Dan arndt (talk) 08:24, 14 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Samarendranath Pandey moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Samarendranath Pandey. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit for review" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Taabii (talk) 13:16, 14 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]